John K. Fairbank's Construction of China, 1930s-1950s: Culture, History, and Imperialism

This paper explores John K. Fairbank's use of the concept "culture" in his explanations of modern Chinese history. Several factors influenced Fairbank's use of culture. Culture started as a way to explain the social and political chasm between China and the West in the 1930s, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of American-East Asian relations 2012-01, Vol.19 (3-4), p.211-234
1. Verfasser: Diana Lin, Xiaoqing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper explores John K. Fairbank's use of the concept "culture" in his explanations of modern Chinese history. Several factors influenced Fairbank's use of culture. Culture started as a way to explain the social and political chasm between China and the West in the 1930s, and culture eventually also became Fairbank's way to express hope in the modernization of China despite the stark social and political reality in the 1940s and after the establishment of Communist China. The modernization theory prevalent in the mid-twentieth century situated his study of China in a universal and rational framework based on fundamentally Western values. On the other hand, Fairbank's extensive experience living in China and befriending Chinese progressives showed him the dilemmas in implementing this purportedly universal and rational plan.
ISSN:1058-3947
1876-5610
1058-3947
DOI:10.1163/18765610-01904003