The incentives of grey directors: Evidence from unexpected executive and board chair turnover
We study the stock market's reaction to the unexpected death of a top executive or board chair for insight into grey director incentives. Whereas there is little debate as to the motives of inside and strict outside directors, the allegiance of grey directors is less certain. We find that grey...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2014-10, Vol.28, p.102-115 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We study the stock market's reaction to the unexpected death of a top executive or board chair for insight into grey director incentives. Whereas there is little debate as to the motives of inside and strict outside directors, the allegiance of grey directors is less certain. We find that grey directors' dominant incentive depends on whether the firm has a succession plan or not. In firms with a succession plan, grey directors' primary motive is to maintain their business ties to the firm. Absent a succession plan, the stock market expects grey directors to use their influence to hire a higher quality replacement, particularly when these directors hold a large equity stake. Our findings suggest that grey directors place their interests as shareholders first when a replacement decision is likely to weaken their business ties with the firm. Grey directors appear to influence the choice of a higher quality replacement whether that person is an insider or outsider.
•We study unexpected turnover for insight on the incentives of grey directors.•Grey directors support incumbents when a succession plan is in place.•Grey directors' stockholdings are the primary incentive absent a succession plan.•Grey director influence extends to both inside and outside replacements. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0929-1199 1872-6313 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.015 |