Need for Autonomy and Resistance to Standardized Employee Selection Practices

Two experiments used a hypothetical hiring scenario to examine (a) how standardizing employee selection practices affects decision makers' perceptions of autonomy potential, and (b) if increasing the level of autonomy inherent in standardized practices reduces decision makers' reluctance to use them. The results of Experiment 1 suggest that decision makers perceived the structured interview and the mechanical approach to data combination as having less autonomy potential than their unstructured and intuition-based counterparts. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that the amount of autonomy inherent in a structured interview and a mechanical data combination procedure significantly affected decision makers' intentions to use them. Together, these findings provide empirical support for the notion that autonomy is an important factor contributing to people's reluctance to use standardized selection practices and that standardized practices may be modified to enhance people's perceptions of autonomy and subsequent use intentions. Individual differences relating to perceptions of autonomy potential are also identified.