Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies: A reply to Kacprzak and Yaskorska

Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies: A reply to Kacprzak and Yaskorska

This note comments on the paper ‘Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies’ by Kacprzak and Yaskorska (this issue). Points discussed include the use of the notions of ‘claiming’, ‘conceding’ and ‘commitment’, and the role of Lorenzen dialogues as a device for checking whether a proposition is a tautol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Argumentation 2014-08, Vol.28 (3), p.371-377
1. Verfasser: Hodges, Wilfrid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Communication Studies
Education
Legal History
Logic
Philosophy
Philosophy of Law
Political Communication
Rhetoric
Theories of Law
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This note comments on the paper ‘Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies’ by Kacprzak and Yaskorska (this issue). Points discussed include the use of the notions of ‘claiming’, ‘conceding’ and ‘commitment’, and the role of Lorenzen dialogues as a device for checking whether a proposition is a tautology.
ISSN:0920-427X
1572-8374
DOI:10.1007/s10503-014-9326-2