Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Routine Practice
In any observational study, there is always the possibility that unmeasured confounders bias the intended comparison regardless of the statistical approach used, including the use of advanced multivariable modeling or propensity score methods. In method 2, we performed 1:1 matching of transradial an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013-12, Vol.62 (22), p.2147-2148 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2148 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 22 |
| container_start_page | 2147 |
| container_title | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
| container_volume | 62 |
| creator | Wimmer, Neil J., MD, MSc Resnic, Frederic S., MD, MSc Mauri, Laura, MD, MSc Matheny, Michael E., MD, MS, MPH Yeh, Robert W., MD, MSc |
| description | In any observational study, there is always the possibility that unmeasured confounders bias the intended comparison regardless of the statistical approach used, including the use of advanced multivariable modeling or propensity score methods. In method 2, we performed 1:1 matching of transradial and transfemoral PCI patients based on propensity score accounting for 19 demographic, clinical, and procedural covariates including anticoagulation strategy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.036 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1552883617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0735109713029434</els_id><sourcerecordid>3401053701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1757-b3c93302e2b281e0dd9c03325794a9a2207d19b558642d6486c072d7c221c6083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC510nye5mcxGk-KdQsGj1GtLsFLK2SU12C_32ZqngaWDmzZt5P0JuKRQUaH3fFZ02pmBAeQGiAF6fkQmtqibnlRTnZAKCVzkFKS7JVYwdANQNlRPSzvxur4ON3mV-k62CdjHo1upt9oUhDvHU2uDOh9RbYjBDrx36NJn54J0Ox2zuegwHdL1NLtZl737orcNsGbTprcFrcrHR24g3f3VKPp-fVrPXfPH2Mp89LnJDRSXyNTeSc2DI1qyhCG0rDXDOKiFLLTVjIFoq1ylVXbK2LpvagGCtMIxRU0PDp-Tu5LsP_mfA2KvOD8GlkyqxYE3DayqSip1UJvgYA27UPthdyqEoqJGm6tRIU400FQiVaKalh9MSpv8PFoMyW-us0dtvPGL8v6MiU6A-Rt4jbpryyJKX_Bf0i34u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1552883617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Routine Practice</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wimmer, Neil J., MD, MSc ; Resnic, Frederic S., MD, MSc ; Mauri, Laura, MD, MSc ; Matheny, Michael E., MD, MS, MPH ; Yeh, Robert W., MD, MSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Neil J., MD, MSc ; Resnic, Frederic S., MD, MSc ; Mauri, Laura, MD, MSc ; Matheny, Michael E., MD, MS, MPH ; Yeh, Robert W., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><description>In any observational study, there is always the possibility that unmeasured confounders bias the intended comparison regardless of the statistical approach used, including the use of advanced multivariable modeling or propensity score methods. In method 2, we performed 1:1 matching of transradial and transfemoral PCI patients based on propensity score accounting for 19 demographic, clinical, and procedural covariates including anticoagulation strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.036</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Cardiovascular ; Clinical trials ; Hypotheses ; Internal Medicine ; Patients ; Statistical methods ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013-12, Vol.62 (22), p.2147-2148</ispartof><rights>American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 3, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1757-b3c93302e2b281e0dd9c03325794a9a2207d19b558642d6486c072d7c221c6083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1757-b3c93302e2b281e0dd9c03325794a9a2207d19b558642d6486c072d7c221c6083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Neil J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resnic, Frederic S., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauri, Laura, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheny, Michael E., MD, MS, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Robert W., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Routine Practice</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><description>In any observational study, there is always the possibility that unmeasured confounders bias the intended comparison regardless of the statistical approach used, including the use of advanced multivariable modeling or propensity score methods. In method 2, we performed 1:1 matching of transradial and transfemoral PCI patients based on propensity score accounting for 19 demographic, clinical, and procedural covariates including anticoagulation strategy.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC510nye5mcxGk-KdQsGj1GtLsFLK2SU12C_32ZqngaWDmzZt5P0JuKRQUaH3fFZ02pmBAeQGiAF6fkQmtqibnlRTnZAKCVzkFKS7JVYwdANQNlRPSzvxur4ON3mV-k62CdjHo1upt9oUhDvHU2uDOh9RbYjBDrx36NJn54J0Ox2zuegwHdL1NLtZl737orcNsGbTprcFrcrHR24g3f3VKPp-fVrPXfPH2Mp89LnJDRSXyNTeSc2DI1qyhCG0rDXDOKiFLLTVjIFoq1ylVXbK2LpvagGCtMIxRU0PDp-Tu5LsP_mfA2KvOD8GlkyqxYE3DayqSip1UJvgYA27UPthdyqEoqJGm6tRIU400FQiVaKalh9MSpv8PFoMyW-us0dtvPGL8v6MiU6A-Rt4jbpryyJKX_Bf0i34u</recordid><startdate>20131203</startdate><enddate>20131203</enddate><creator>Wimmer, Neil J., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Resnic, Frederic S., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Mauri, Laura, MD, MSc</creator><creator>Matheny, Michael E., MD, MS, MPH</creator><creator>Yeh, Robert W., MD, MSc</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131203</creationdate><title>Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Routine Practice</title><author>Wimmer, Neil J., MD, MSc ; Resnic, Frederic S., MD, MSc ; Mauri, Laura, MD, MSc ; Matheny, Michael E., MD, MS, MPH ; Yeh, Robert W., MD, MSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1757-b3c93302e2b281e0dd9c03325794a9a2207d19b558642d6486c072d7c221c6083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Neil J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resnic, Frederic S., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauri, Laura, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheny, Michael E., MD, MS, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Robert W., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wimmer, Neil J., MD, MSc</au><au>Resnic, Frederic S., MD, MSc</au><au>Mauri, Laura, MD, MSc</au><au>Matheny, Michael E., MD, MS, MPH</au><au>Yeh, Robert W., MD, MSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Routine Practice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><date>2013-12-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>2147</spage><epage>2148</epage><pages>2147-2148</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>In any observational study, there is always the possibility that unmeasured confounders bias the intended comparison regardless of the statistical approach used, including the use of advanced multivariable modeling or propensity score methods. In method 2, we performed 1:1 matching of transradial and transfemoral PCI patients based on propensity score accounting for 19 demographic, clinical, and procedural covariates including anticoagulation strategy.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.036</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0735-1097 |
| ispartof | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013-12, Vol.62 (22), p.2147-2148 |
| issn | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1552883617 |
| source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Cardiology Cardiovascular Clinical trials Hypotheses Internal Medicine Patients Statistical methods Studies |
| title | Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Routine Practice |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T07%3A40%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Transradial%20Versus%20Transfemoral%20Percutaneous%20Coronary%20Intervention%20in%20Routine%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Wimmer,%20Neil%20J.,%20MD,%20MSc&rft.date=2013-12-03&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=2147&rft.epage=2148&rft.pages=2147-2148&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3401053701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1552883617&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0735109713029434&rfr_iscdi=true |