Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Routine Practice
In any observational study, there is always the possibility that unmeasured confounders bias the intended comparison regardless of the statistical approach used, including the use of advanced multivariable modeling or propensity score methods. In method 2, we performed 1:1 matching of transradial an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013-12, Vol.62 (22), p.2147-2148 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In any observational study, there is always the possibility that unmeasured confounders bias the intended comparison regardless of the statistical approach used, including the use of advanced multivariable modeling or propensity score methods. In method 2, we performed 1:1 matching of transradial and transfemoral PCI patients based on propensity score accounting for 19 demographic, clinical, and procedural covariates including anticoagulation strategy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.036 |