The Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really Thinking

Instead of the usual chronological narrative of the convention, he divides the convention debate into eleven subject areas, ranging from congressional selection to national security and foreign policy. While the book makes no major revisions to our understanding of either the convention or the Const...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of southern history 2014, Vol.80 (3), p.689-690
1. Verfasser: Ericson, David F.
Format: Review
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Instead of the usual chronological narrative of the convention, he divides the convention debate into eleven subject areas, ranging from congressional selection to national security and foreign policy. While the book makes no major revisions to our understanding of either the convention or the Constitution, Robertson makes two points that are all too often overlooked in both public and academic discussions of the convention.
ISSN:0022-4642
2325-6893