Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Considers Design Professional’s Limitation of Liability Clause
Limitation of liability clauses serve to establish a contractual ceiling on the amount of damages to be awarded if a plaintiff prevails in litigation between the contracting parties. Design professionals often use these clauses because their errors or omissions could expose them to damages far in ex...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983) N.Y. 1983), 2014-06, Vol.84 (6), p.84-84 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Limitation of liability clauses serve to establish a contractual ceiling on the amount of damages to be awarded if a plaintiff prevails in litigation between the contracting parties. Design professionals often use these clauses because their errors or omissions could expose them to damages far in excess of their fees for a project. While these clauses are typically enforced by the courts, they are frequently the subject of legal challenges, as evidenced by a recent case heard by the US Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals involving a multi-million-dollar lawsuit against an architecture and engineering firm. The clause in this case enabled the design professional to limit damages to the amount of the fee, $70,000. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2381-0688 0885-7024 2381-0688 |
DOI: | 10.1061/ciegag.0000731 |