Henry Delahay Symonds and James Ridgway’s Conversion from Whig Pamphleteers to Doyens of the Radical Press, 1788–1793

Robinson talks about Symonds and Ridgway's conversion from Whig Pamphleteers to Doyens of the radical press. In his review of the sixth, enlarged edition of Lessons to a Young Prince (1790), the classicist and historian John Gillies followed a persistent tendency in contemporary criticism to re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 2014-03, Vol.108 (1), p.61-90
1. Verfasser: Robinson, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Robinson talks about Symonds and Ridgway's conversion from Whig Pamphleteers to Doyens of the radical press. In his review of the sixth, enlarged edition of Lessons to a Young Prince (1790), the classicist and historian John Gillies followed a persistent tendency in contemporary criticism to read (and to dismiss) Lessons as "another Whig tract," despite its appeal for the non-partisan consideration of alternative political constitutions and trenchant disavowal of any party interest. In his dismissal of the pamphlet's author, Gillies even enlisted the support of the not-so-long departed Samuel Johnson. Gillies's diagnosis derived from his conflation of the perceived political values of its publishers Henry Delahay Symonds and James Ridgway with the text itself rather than through a careful examination of the political values that it expressed, indicating that the publishers found it hard to slough off their earlier associations with the Whig press.
ISSN:0006-128X
2377-6528
DOI:10.1086/680834