Stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases: A report of the DEGRO Working Group on Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Background This report from the Working Group on Stereotaktische Radiotherapie of the German Society of Radiation Oncology ( Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie , DEGRO) provides recommendations for the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on patients with brain metastases. It considers exist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2014-06, Vol.190 (6), p.521-532
Hauptverfasser: Kocher, Martin, Wittig, Andrea, Piroth, Marc Dieter, Treuer, Harald, Seegenschmiedt, Heinrich, Ruge, Maximilian, Grosu, Anca-Ligia, Guckenberger, Matthias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background This report from the Working Group on Stereotaktische Radiotherapie of the German Society of Radiation Oncology ( Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie , DEGRO) provides recommendations for the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on patients with brain metastases. It considers existing international guidelines and details them where appropriate. Results and discussion The main recommendations are: Patients with solid tumors except germ cell tumors and small-cell lung cancer with a life expectancy of more than 3 months suffering from a single brain metastasis of less than 3 cm in diameter should be considered for SRS. Especially when metastases are not amenable to surgery, are located in the brain stem, and have no mass effect, SRS should be offered to the patient. For multiple (two to four) metastases—all less than 2.5 cm in diameter—in patients with a life expectancy of more than 3 months, SRS should be used rather than whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Adjuvant WBRT after SRS for both single and multiple (two to four) metastases increases local control and reduces the frequency of distant brain metastases, but does not prolong survival when compared with SRS and salvage treatment. As WBRT carries the risk of inducing neurocognitive damage, it seems reasonable to withhold WBRT for as long as possible. Conclusion A single (marginal) dose of 20 Gy is a reasonable choice that balances the effect on the treated lesion (local control, partial remission) against the risk of late side effects (radionecrosis). Higher doses (22–25 Gy) may be used for smaller (
ISSN:0179-7158
1439-099X
DOI:10.1007/s00066-014-0648-7