Response to Leo Depuydt, “The Alleged Gospel of Jesus's Wife: Assessment and Evaluation of Authenticity.”
King asserts that Leo Depuydt's essay does not offer any substantial evidence or persuasive argument, let alone unequivocal surety, that the "Gospel of Jesus's Wife" fragment is a modern fabrication (forgery). Should the fragment be proved on other grounds to be such, a few of th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Harvard theological review 2014-04, Vol.107 (2), p.190-193 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 193 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 190 |
| container_title | The Harvard theological review |
| container_volume | 107 |
| creator | King, Karen L. |
| description | King asserts that Leo Depuydt's essay does not offer any substantial evidence or persuasive argument, let alone unequivocal surety, that the "Gospel of Jesus's Wife" fragment is a modern fabrication (forgery). Should the fragment be proved on other grounds to be such, a few of these observations may, however, be useful in hypothesizing how it may have been done. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0017816014000200 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1514201842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0017816014000200</cupid><galeid>A367547323</galeid><jstor_id>43297568</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A367547323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-5f36141e2d0ad772a83f9dc412f35d705b9a79bb414fe440039738626439463f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktGK1DAUhosoOK4-gBdCwAsRtmPSpE3rXR3XcWVgQVe8DJn2ZLZD29ScVJy7fZD15fZJzDiDy-AoEkjg_N9_TpJzougpo1NGmXz1iYY9ZxllglKaUHovmjAh01ikTN6PJls53uoPo0eI68DQTIhJ1H0EHGyPQLwlC7DkLQzjpvan5Pb65vIKSNm2sIKazC0O0BJryAfAEV8g-dIYeE1KREDsoPdE9zU5-6bbUfvG9lu0HP1VUJqq8Zvp7fWPx9EDo1uEJ_vzJPr87uxy9j5eXMzPZ-UirtKC-zg1PGOCQVJTXUuZ6Jyboq4ESwxPa0nTZaFlsVwKJgyI8GBeSJ5nSSZ4ITJu-En0fJd3cPbrCOjV2o6uDyUVS5lIKMtFcketdAuq6Y31Tlddg5UqeSZTIXnCAxUfoVbQg9Ot7cE0IXzAT4_wYdXQNdVRw8sDQ2A8fPcrPSKq8zfz_2bz-eJfF9-zlf3VURU-fHZxyLMdXzmL6MCowTWddhvFqNoOmfpjyILn2c6zRm_db4PgSSHTLA863-fU3dI1dah714m_Zv0JrAzXXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1514201842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to Leo Depuydt, “The Alleged Gospel of Jesus's Wife: Assessment and Evaluation of Authenticity.”</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>King, Karen L.</creator><creatorcontrib>King, Karen L.</creatorcontrib><description>King asserts that Leo Depuydt's essay does not offer any substantial evidence or persuasive argument, let alone unequivocal surety, that the "Gospel of Jesus's Wife" fragment is a modern fabrication (forgery). Should the fragment be proved on other grounds to be such, a few of these observations may, however, be useful in hypothesizing how it may have been done.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-8160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0017816014000200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Authors ; Catholicism ; Christian ethics ; Conception ; Criticism and interpretation ; Depuydt, Leo ; Exegesis & hermeneutics ; Forgery ; Jesus Christ ; Literary dialogue ; Persuasion ; Sacred texts ; Syntactical antecedents ; Theology ; Writers</subject><ispartof>The Harvard theological review, 2014-04, Vol.107 (2), p.190-193</ispartof><rights>Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 2014</rights><rights>Copyright President and Fellows of Harvard College, 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-5f36141e2d0ad772a83f9dc412f35d705b9a79bb414fe440039738626439463f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43297568$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0017816014000200/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,27923,27924,55627,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, Karen L.</creatorcontrib><title>Response to Leo Depuydt, “The Alleged Gospel of Jesus's Wife: Assessment and Evaluation of Authenticity.”</title><title>The Harvard theological review</title><addtitle>H. Theolo. Review</addtitle><description>King asserts that Leo Depuydt's essay does not offer any substantial evidence or persuasive argument, let alone unequivocal surety, that the "Gospel of Jesus's Wife" fragment is a modern fabrication (forgery). Should the fragment be proved on other grounds to be such, a few of these observations may, however, be useful in hypothesizing how it may have been done.</description><subject>Authors</subject><subject>Catholicism</subject><subject>Christian ethics</subject><subject>Conception</subject><subject>Criticism and interpretation</subject><subject>Depuydt, Leo</subject><subject>Exegesis & hermeneutics</subject><subject>Forgery</subject><subject>Jesus Christ</subject><subject>Literary dialogue</subject><subject>Persuasion</subject><subject>Sacred texts</subject><subject>Syntactical antecedents</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>0017-8160</issn><issn>1475-4517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktGK1DAUhosoOK4-gBdCwAsRtmPSpE3rXR3XcWVgQVe8DJn2ZLZD29ScVJy7fZD15fZJzDiDy-AoEkjg_N9_TpJzougpo1NGmXz1iYY9ZxllglKaUHovmjAh01ikTN6PJls53uoPo0eI68DQTIhJ1H0EHGyPQLwlC7DkLQzjpvan5Pb65vIKSNm2sIKazC0O0BJryAfAEV8g-dIYeE1KREDsoPdE9zU5-6bbUfvG9lu0HP1VUJqq8Zvp7fWPx9EDo1uEJ_vzJPr87uxy9j5eXMzPZ-UirtKC-zg1PGOCQVJTXUuZ6Jyboq4ESwxPa0nTZaFlsVwKJgyI8GBeSJ5nSSZ4ITJu-En0fJd3cPbrCOjV2o6uDyUVS5lIKMtFcketdAuq6Y31Tlddg5UqeSZTIXnCAxUfoVbQg9Ot7cE0IXzAT4_wYdXQNdVRw8sDQ2A8fPcrPSKq8zfz_2bz-eJfF9-zlf3VURU-fHZxyLMdXzmL6MCowTWddhvFqNoOmfpjyILn2c6zRm_db4PgSSHTLA863-fU3dI1dah714m_Zv0JrAzXXQ</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>King, Karen L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Response to Leo Depuydt, “The Alleged Gospel of Jesus's Wife: Assessment and Evaluation of Authenticity.”</title><author>King, Karen L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-5f36141e2d0ad772a83f9dc412f35d705b9a79bb414fe440039738626439463f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Authors</topic><topic>Catholicism</topic><topic>Christian ethics</topic><topic>Conception</topic><topic>Criticism and interpretation</topic><topic>Depuydt, Leo</topic><topic>Exegesis & hermeneutics</topic><topic>Forgery</topic><topic>Jesus Christ</topic><topic>Literary dialogue</topic><topic>Persuasion</topic><topic>Sacred texts</topic><topic>Syntactical antecedents</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, Karen L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Harvard theological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, Karen L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to Leo Depuydt, “The Alleged Gospel of Jesus's Wife: Assessment and Evaluation of Authenticity.”</atitle><jtitle>The Harvard theological review</jtitle><addtitle>H. Theolo. Review</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>190</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>190-193</pages><issn>0017-8160</issn><eissn>1475-4517</eissn><abstract>King asserts that Leo Depuydt's essay does not offer any substantial evidence or persuasive argument, let alone unequivocal surety, that the "Gospel of Jesus's Wife" fragment is a modern fabrication (forgery). Should the fragment be proved on other grounds to be such, a few of these observations may, however, be useful in hypothesizing how it may have been done.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0017816014000200</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0017-8160 |
| ispartof | The Harvard theological review, 2014-04, Vol.107 (2), p.190-193 |
| issn | 0017-8160 1475-4517 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1514201842 |
| source | Cambridge Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Authors Catholicism Christian ethics Conception Criticism and interpretation Depuydt, Leo Exegesis & hermeneutics Forgery Jesus Christ Literary dialogue Persuasion Sacred texts Syntactical antecedents Theology Writers |
| title | Response to Leo Depuydt, “The Alleged Gospel of Jesus's Wife: Assessment and Evaluation of Authenticity.” |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A31%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20Leo%20Depuydt,%20%E2%80%9CThe%20Alleged%20Gospel%20of%20Jesus's%20Wife:%20Assessment%20and%20Evaluation%20of%20Authenticity.%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=The%20Harvard%20theological%20review&rft.au=King,%20Karen%20L.&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=190&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=190-193&rft.issn=0017-8160&rft.eissn=1475-4517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0017816014000200&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA367547323%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1514201842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A367547323&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0017816014000200&rft_jstor_id=43297568&rfr_iscdi=true |