Response to Leo Depuydt, “The Alleged Gospel of Jesus's Wife: Assessment and Evaluation of Authenticity.”
King asserts that Leo Depuydt's essay does not offer any substantial evidence or persuasive argument, let alone unequivocal surety, that the "Gospel of Jesus's Wife" fragment is a modern fabrication (forgery). Should the fragment be proved on other grounds to be such, a few of th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Harvard theological review 2014-04, Vol.107 (2), p.190-193 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | King asserts that Leo Depuydt's essay does not offer any substantial evidence or persuasive argument, let alone unequivocal surety, that the "Gospel of Jesus's Wife" fragment is a modern fabrication (forgery). Should the fragment be proved on other grounds to be such, a few of these observations may, however, be useful in hypothesizing how it may have been done. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-8160 1475-4517 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0017816014000200 |