Estimating the Marketability Discounts: A Comparison Between Bid-Ask Spreads, and Longstaff's Upper Bound
This paper contends that the discount for lack of marketability (DLOM) is the difference between the stock price of a liquid company and an equivalent illiquid company and reflects the lack of a free-trading option that is embedded within a company's stock. Longstaff derived a model that views...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied finance : JAF 2013-01, Vol.23 (1), p.57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper contends that the discount for lack of marketability (DLOM) is the difference between the stock price of a liquid company and an equivalent illiquid company and reflects the lack of a free-trading option that is embedded within a company's stock. Longstaff derived a model that views this liquidity swap as a lookback option. We equate this option to the Bid-Ask spread of a stock consistent with the market microstructure literature. We construct a model for the DLOM using the Longstaff (1995) metric and the Bid-Ask spread of Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board stocks as a proxy. We find that our spread-based model does a better job of predicting restricted stock dis counts than the Longstaff metric. We include a case study on two companies to illustrate our methodology. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1534-6668 |