Morphometric Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Relevance With Optical Coherence Tomography

Objectives The study sought to assess the diagnostic efficiency of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in identifying hemodynamically severe coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve (FFR). Concomitant OCT and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) area measurements were performed in a subg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2012-03, Vol.59 (12), p.1080-1089
Hauptverfasser: Gonzalo, Nieve, MD, PhD, Escaned, Javier, MD, PhD, Alfonso, Fernando, MD, PhD, Nolte, Christian, MD, Rodriguez, Vera, BSc, Jimenez-Quevedo, Pilar, MD, PhD, Bañuelos, Camino, MD, Fernández-Ortiz, Antonia, MD, PhD, Garcia, Eulogio, MD, Hernandez-Antolin, Rosana, MD, PhD, Macaya, Carlos, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The study sought to assess the diagnostic efficiency of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in identifying hemodynamically severe coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve (FFR). Concomitant OCT and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) area measurements were performed in a subgroup of patients to compare the diagnostic efficiency of both techniques. Background The value of OCT to determine stenosis severity remains unsettled. Methods Sixty-one stenoses with intermediate angiographic severity were studied in 56 patients. Stenoses were labeled as severe if FFR ≤0.80. OCT interrogation was performed in all cases, with concomitant IVUS imaging in 47 cases. Results Angiographic stenosis severity was 50.9 ± 8% diameter stenosis with 1.28 ± 0.3 mm minimal lumen diameter. FFR was ≤0.80 in 28 (45.9%) stenoses. An overall moderate diagnostic efficiency of OCT was found (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 0.84), with sensitivity/specificity of 82%/63% associated with an optimal cutoff value of 1.95 mm2 . Comparison of the results in patients with simultaneous IVUS and OCT imaging revealed no significant differences in the diagnostic efficiency of OCT (AUC: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.83) and IVUS (AUC. 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.77; p = 0.19). Sensitivity/specificity for IVUS was 67%/65% for an optimal cutoff value of 2.36 mm2 . In the subgroup of small vessels (reference diameter
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.078