A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of traditional Chinese medicine compound kushen injection for bone cancer pain

Purpose Bone cancer pain presents a clinical challenge with limitations of current treatments. Compound kushen injection (CKI) is a well-known traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formulation in treatment of patients with bone cancer pain. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2014-03, Vol.22 (3), p.825-836
Hauptverfasser: Yanju, Bao, Yang, Liping, Hua, Baojin, Hou, Wei, Shi, Zhan, Li, Weidong, Li, Conghuang, Chen, Cihui, Liu, Rui, Qin, Yinggang, Lv, Wenliang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Bone cancer pain presents a clinical challenge with limitations of current treatments. Compound kushen injection (CKI) is a well-known traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formulation in treatment of patients with bone cancer pain. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of CKI for bone cancer pain. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in nine databases until December 2012 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CKI versus current western therapies for bone cancer pain. The primary outcome was total pain relief rate. The secondary outcomes were the quality of life and adverse events at the end of treatment course. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed independently using six-item criteria according to the Cochrane Collaboration, and the level of evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.1.0. Results Seven RCTs with 521 patients from 2010 to 2012 were identified. Compared with radiotherapy or bisphosphonates, seven RCTs showed significant effects of CKI for improving pain relief in patients with bone cancer pain ( n  = 521, risk ratio (RR) = 1.25, 95 % CI (95 % confidence intervals (CI)), 1.13 to 1.38, p  
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-013-2063-5