Randomized controlled study of gemcitabine plus S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive GS (oral S-1 60 mg/m 2 daily on days 1–15 every 3 weeks and gemcitabine 1,000 mg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2014-02, Vol.73 (2), p.389-396 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Methods
Patients were randomly assigned to receive GS (oral S-1 60 mg/m
2
daily on days 1–15 every 3 weeks and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m
2
on days 8 and 15) or gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m
2
on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
One hundred and one patients were randomly assigned. PFS was significantly longer in the GS arm with an estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 (95 % CI 0.43
–
0.98;
P
= 0.039; median 5.3 vs 3.8 months). Objective response rate (ORR) was also better in the GS arm (21.6 vs 6 %,
P
= 0.048). Median survival was 8.6 months for GS and 8.6 months for GEM (HR 0.93; 95 % CI 0.61
–
1.41;
P
= 0.714). Grade 3–4 neutropenia (44 vs 19.6 %,
P
= 0.011) and thrombocytopenia (26 vs 8.7 %,
P
= 0.051) were more frequent in the GS arm.
Conclusions
GS therapy improved PFS and ORR with acceptable toxicity profile in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0344-5704 1432-0843 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00280-013-2368-6 |