Genotype and Environment Variation in Elemental Composition of Spring Wheat Flag Leaves

Genotypes within species have been reported to vary in tissue elemental concentration even though this variation is seldom quantified. A survey was conducted to determine the degree of variability of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em thell.) genotypes across multiple environments. Flag leaves we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2014-01, Vol.106 (1), p.324-336
Hauptverfasser: Kaiser, Daniel E., Wiersma, Jochum J., Anderson, James A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Genotypes within species have been reported to vary in tissue elemental concentration even though this variation is seldom quantified. A survey was conducted to determine the degree of variability of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em thell.) genotypes across multiple environments. Flag leaves were sampled on the same day when the genotypes were at or slightly beyond Haun growth stage 11.0 (heading) and quantified for N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, B, Cl, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn. Flag leaf tissue concentration differed among genotype and environment, and the genotype × environment (G×E) interaction was significant except for flag leaf Cu and Fe concentration. The significant G×E interaction indicated genotype response in tissue concentration that was greater or less than the average of all genotypes at a given environment. There was no genotype that greater or less than average across environments for all elemental concentrations. Yield was poorly correlated to the average concentration of individual elements across genotypes and environments. The best correlation was found between yield and flag leaf concentration of Cl. Variation in concentration of elements in flag leaves were explained by temperature, precipitation, and the crop maturity at sampling. Very little variability, except for S, could be explained by soil tests (0–15 cm) taken at the time of tissue sampling. A single sufficiency range for nutrient composition of plant parts may be inadequate for use across genotypes and a significant degree of variability may be the result of factors that cannot be controlled.
ISSN:0002-1962
1435-0645
DOI:10.2134/agronj2013.0329