Truly Empiricist Semantics
In van Fraassen's The Scientific Imagewe are told that the scientific anti-realist need not appeal to some special (e.g. reductionist) semantics for scientific language. He can allegedly hold – just like his direct opponents typically do – that truth-conditional semantics is appropriate both fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dialectica 1998-01, Vol.52 (2), p.127-150 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In van Fraassen's The Scientific Imagewe are told that the scientific anti-realist need not appeal to some special (e.g. reductionist) semantics for scientific language. He can allegedly hold – just like his direct opponents typically do – that truth-conditional semantics is appropriate both for claims about the observable and claims about the unobservable. However, I shall point out that this kind of semantics goes badly with the anti-realist's epistemic attitude vis-à-vis the unobservable. In this paper an alternative semantics shall be outlined that is perfectly compatible with the rest of the anti-realist's position. Although this alternative semantics will be seen to fly in the face of the established doctrine in the field, I shall argue that there is currently no good reason not to adopt it. It will further be pointed out that this semantics has something to be recommended from a realist perspective as well. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-2017 1746-8361 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1998.tb00045.x |