Finding better investment trade-offs: new solutions for mitigating risk
The traditional approach to asset allocation relies on equities for growth and bonds for risk control. If a classic mix cannot deliver a return goal at an acceptable level of risk, investors face two unappealing choices. The first is simply to become more tolerant of risk; the second is to forego re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The CPA journal (1975) 2013-09, Vol.83 (9), p.50 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The traditional approach to asset allocation relies on equities for growth and bonds for risk control. If a classic mix cannot deliver a return goal at an acceptable level of risk, investors face two unappealing choices. The first is simply to become more tolerant of risk; the second is to forego return, which requires investors to scale back on their spending or postpone their retirement. But a third, more attractive path for investors does exist: adopting a range of risk-management strategies that offer better trade-offs than the conventional approach. An accepted tenet of investing is that reward and risk go hand in hand: the more investors want the former, the more they will need to accept the latter. Challenging periods for stocks can be prolonged by long-lived hostile conditions. Research-based tactical adjustments to asset allocation complement insurance as a short-term risk strategy. This strategy deserves skepticism; after all, investors are notoriously poor at timing decisions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0732-8435 |