Overcoming MedsCheck barriers: Are we there yet?
RESULTS: One-hundred and six pharmacists completed the survey. Since expansion, computer-based tools (n = 68, 64%) and drop-in MedsChecks (n = 45, 42%) were more frequently used as enablers, whereas the amount of time available for MedsChecks remained the same (54%, n = 57) or less (28%, n = 30) and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian pharmacists journal 2013-09, Vol.146, p.S6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | RESULTS: One-hundred and six pharmacists completed the survey. Since expansion, computer-based tools (n = 68, 64%) and drop-in MedsChecks (n = 45, 42%) were more frequently used as enablers, whereas the amount of time available for MedsChecks remained the same (54%, n = 57) or less (28%, n = 30) and the availability of pharmacist overlap was less (19%, n = 20) or not available (25%, n = 27). Although more than half (53%, n = 56) indicated less than 10% of MedsChecks were by appointment, 16% (n = 17) of pharmacists almost exclusively conducted MedsChecks by appointment. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1715-1635 1913-701X |