Overcoming MedsCheck barriers: Are we there yet?

RESULTS: One-hundred and six pharmacists completed the survey. Since expansion, computer-based tools (n = 68, 64%) and drop-in MedsChecks (n = 45, 42%) were more frequently used as enablers, whereas the amount of time available for MedsChecks remained the same (54%, n = 57) or less (28%, n = 30) and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian pharmacists journal 2013-09, Vol.146, p.S6
Hauptverfasser: Malian, Nicholas, Welner, Oliver, Waite, Nancy, Folia, Christine, Agro, Paul, Agro, Karen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:RESULTS: One-hundred and six pharmacists completed the survey. Since expansion, computer-based tools (n = 68, 64%) and drop-in MedsChecks (n = 45, 42%) were more frequently used as enablers, whereas the amount of time available for MedsChecks remained the same (54%, n = 57) or less (28%, n = 30) and the availability of pharmacist overlap was less (19%, n = 20) or not available (25%, n = 27). Although more than half (53%, n = 56) indicated less than 10% of MedsChecks were by appointment, 16% (n = 17) of pharmacists almost exclusively conducted MedsChecks by appointment.
ISSN:1715-1635
1913-701X