Underperformance of founder-led firms: An examination of compensation contracting theories during the executive stock options backdating scandal
Using the executive stock option (ESO) backdating scandal as a backdrop, this paper examines whether compensation committees can effectively set executive compensation contracts in the presence of a founding CEO. Analyzing a sample of firms accused of backdating ESO grant dates and a control sample...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2013-12, Vol.23, p.294-310 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Using the executive stock option (ESO) backdating scandal as a backdrop, this paper examines whether compensation committees can effectively set executive compensation contracts in the presence of a founding CEO. Analyzing a sample of firms accused of backdating ESO grant dates and a control sample of non-backdating firms, we find evidence suggesting that managerial power influences the decision to backdate. Specifically, our analysis indicates the presence of a founder CEO increases the likelihood that ESOs are backdated by 22%. We further find that founder-led firms strongly underperform a matched sample of non-backdating firms. This finding contrasts a number of studies that document superior operating and stock return performance for founder-led firms.
•Managerial power influences the decision to backdate executive stock options.•The presence of a founder CEO increases the likelihood of backdated ESOs by 22%.•Founder-led backdating firms strongly underperform a matched sample. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0929-1199 1872-6313 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.09.002 |