SE TAIRE, NIER OU S'EXCUSER: Comment répondre à un appel au boycott ?/TO REMAIN SILENT, TO DENY OR TO APOLOGY: HOW TO ANSWER TO A BOYCOTT REQUEST?
This study deals with the process underlying the impact of three crisis communication strategies - silence, deny and apology - identified in the literature, on boycott intent and buying intent. The case investigated is a boycott request concerning the use of chemical products on meat sold by a super...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Décisions marketing 2012-10 (68), p.71 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | fre |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study deals with the process underlying the impact of three crisis communication strategies - silence, deny and apology - identified in the literature, on boycott intent and buying intent. The case investigated is a boycott request concerning the use of chemical products on meat sold by a supermarket. Results show that depending the target, the firm should deny or apologize and that silence is an underperforming strategy. [PUB ABSTRACT] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1253-0476 |