Preparation and Adsorption Property of Phenyltriethoxysilane Modified SiO2 Aerogel

The hydrophobic silica aerogel (SiO2 aerogel) was prepared by/n situ polymerization sol-gel method and ethanol supercritical drying, with tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) as silica source, phenyltriethoxysilane (PTES) as modifier, ethanol as solvent and ammonia as catalyst. The effects of n(PTES)/n(TOES) we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Wuhan University of Technology. Materials science edition 2013-10, Vol.28 (5), p.916-920
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Benlan, Cui, Sheng, Liu, Xueyong, Liu, Yu, Shen, Xiaodong, Han, Guifan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The hydrophobic silica aerogel (SiO2 aerogel) was prepared by/n situ polymerization sol-gel method and ethanol supercritical drying, with tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) as silica source, phenyltriethoxysilane (PTES) as modifier, ethanol as solvent and ammonia as catalyst. The effects of n(PTES)/n(TOES) were investigated on gel time, structure, and hydrophobicity. The SiO2 aerogel was measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The effects of n(PTES)/n(TOES) were also studied on adsorption property of pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, benzene, toluene, o-xylenc, nitromethane, nitroethane, and nitrobenzene. The adsorption intensity of SiO2 aerogel was compared with that of activated carbon. The results show, with the increasing ofn(PTES)/n(TOES), the surface area, pore volume, and pore size of SiO2 aerogel decreased, gel time and hydrophobicity increased, and the contact angle could be 154° with n(PTES)/n(TOES)=0.7. The adsorption intensity of SiO2 aerogel with n(PTES)/n(TOES)=0.5 was bigger than that of activated carbon with an average 5.84 times of 10 organic liquid. The adsorption intensity of aerogel with n(PTES)/n(TOES) =0.1 was the best one in all samples with the average 8.33 times compared with that of activated carbon.
ISSN:1000-2413
1993-0437
DOI:10.1007/s11595-013-0793-3