Palladium Supported Catalysts for Nitrocyclohexane Hydrogenation to Cyclohexanone Oxime with High Selectivity

Different kinds of activated carbon‐ and carbon nanotube‐supported palladium catalysts were investigated in the selective hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane to cyclohexanone oxime under mild conditions. Carbon nanotube‐supported palladium catalysts demonstrate better catalytic performance than activa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ChemCatChem 2013-10, Vol.5 (10), p.2932-2938
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Ping-Le, Zhang, Hai-Ke, Liu, Si-Hua, Yao, Zheng-Jie, Hao, Fang, Liao, Hong-Guang, You, Kui-Yi, Luo, He-An
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Different kinds of activated carbon‐ and carbon nanotube‐supported palladium catalysts were investigated in the selective hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane to cyclohexanone oxime under mild conditions. Carbon nanotube‐supported palladium catalysts demonstrate better catalytic performance than activated carbon‐supported palladium catalysts in general because of their mesoporous structures, which are favorable supports for the accessibility of the reactants to the active sites and the product desorption from the catalyst. Hydrogen chemisorption, transmission electron microscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy indicate that higher composition of Pd+ on the catalyst surface, larger palladium surface area, and better palladium dispersion contribute to an increase in the activity and selectivity toward cyclohexanone oxime. In addition, single‐wall carbon nanotube‐supported palladium catalysts give the best result of 97.7 % conversion of nitrocyclohexane and 97.4 % selectivity toward cyclohexanone oxime. On the basis of the results of GC–MS and the designed experiments, a possible reaction scheme was proposed. Brilliance in the performance: Carbon nanotube‐supported palladium catalysts demonstrate better catalytic performance than activated carbon‐supported palladium catalysts in general because of their mesoporous structures, which are favorable supports for the accessibility of the reactants to the active sites and the product desorption from the catalyst.
ISSN:1867-3880
1867-3899
DOI:10.1002/cctc.201300377