Obtaining Validity Evidence by Cognitive Interviewing to Interpret Psychometric Results

The latest edition of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing ( APA, 1999 ) promotes the analysis of respondents' response processes in order to obtain evidence about the fit between the intended construct and the response process produced. The aim of this paper was twofold. Fir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Methodology 2013-01, Vol.9 (3), p.113-122
Hauptverfasser: Padilla, José-Luis, Benítez, Isabel, Castillo, Miguel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The latest edition of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing ( APA, 1999 ) promotes the analysis of respondents' response processes in order to obtain evidence about the fit between the intended construct and the response process produced. The aim of this paper was twofold. First, we assess whether cognitive interviewing can be used to gather such validity evidence, and secondly, to analyze the usefulness of the evidence provided for interpreting the results from traditional psychometric analysis. The usefulness of the Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework ( Boeije & Willis, 2013 ) for reporting the cognitive interviewing findings was also evaluated. As an empirical example, we tested the (Spanish language) APGAR family function scale. A total of 21 pretest cognitive interviews were conducted, and psychometric analyzes were conducted of data from 28,371 respondents who were administered the APGAR scale. Results and utility of CIRF as a reporting framework are discussed.
ISSN:1614-1881
1614-2241
DOI:10.1027/1614-2241/a000073