Drivers of [beta]-diversity along latitudinal gradients revisited
Aim Ecologists have generally agreed that [beta]-diversity is driven at least in part by ecological processes and mechanisms of community assembly and is a key determinant of global patterns of species richness. This idea has been challenged by a recent study based on an individual-based null model...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global ecology and biogeography 2013-06, Vol.22 (6), p.659 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim Ecologists have generally agreed that [beta]-diversity is driven at least in part by ecological processes and mechanisms of community assembly and is a key determinant of global patterns of species richness. This idea has been challenged by a recent study based on an individual-based null model approach, which aims to account for the species pool. The goal of the present study is twofold: (1) to analyse data sets from different parts of the world to determine whether there are significant latitude-[beta]-diversity gradients after accounting for the species pool, and (2) to evaluate the validity of the null model. Location Global. Methods A total of 257 forest plots, each being 0.1 ha in size and having 10 0.01-ha subplots, were used. We conducted four sets of analyses. A modified version of Whittaker's [beta]-diversity index was used to quantify [beta]-diversity for each forest plot. A randomization procedure was used to determine expected [beta]-diversity. Results The number of individuals per species, which characterizes species abundance distribution, alone explains 56.8-84.2% of the variation in observed [beta]-diversity. Species pool ([gamma]-diversity) explained only an additional 2.6-15.2% of the variation in observed [beta]-diversity. Latitude explains 18.6% of the variation in raw [beta] deviation in Gentry's global data set, and explains 11.0-11.6% of the variation in standardized [beta] deviation in the global and three regional analyses. Latitude explains 33.2-46.2% of the variation in the number of individuals per species. Main conclusions Species abundance distribution, rather than species pool size, plays a key role in driving latitude-[beta]-diversity gradients for [beta]-diversity in local forest communities. The individual-based null model is not a valid null model for investigating [beta]-diversity gradients driven by mechanisms of local community assembly because the null model incorporates species abundance distributions, which are driven by mechanisms of local community assembly and in turn generate [beta]-diversity gradients. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1466-822X 1466-8238 |
DOI: | 10.1111/geb.12020 |