Late course accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background Late course accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy (LCAHR) is used as a standard treatment option for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC) in China, but concerns remain regarding its efficacy and safety. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the efficacy a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thoracic cancer 2013-05, Vol.4 (2), p.174-185
Hauptverfasser: Meng, Mao-Bin, Jiang, Chao, Tian, Li-Jun, Liu, Chun-Lei, Zhuang, Hong-Qing, Chen, Zhong-Jie, Song, Yong-Chun, Wang, Jun, Pang, Qing-Song, Zhao, Lu-Jun, Yuan, Zhi-Yong, Wang, Ping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Late course accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy (LCAHR) is used as a standard treatment option for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC) in China, but concerns remain regarding its efficacy and safety. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCAHR. The comparisons examined were as follows: LCAHR versus conventional fractionation radiotherapy (CFR) and LCAHR plus chemotherapy (CT) versus LCAHR alone. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CBMdisc, and CNKI, as well as employing manual searches. The primary end points were survival and local control. The second end point was toxicities. Results Based on search criteria, we found 29 trials involving 3187 patients. Our results showed that LCAHR, compared with CFR, improved the survival and local control, and was, thus, more therapeutically beneficial. Further analysis revealed that LCAHR plus CT proved to be better for patients' survival and local control compared to LCAHR alone. Acute toxicities were increased rather than late toxicities. Conclusions There was a significant survival and local control benefit of LCAHR over CFR, as well as LCAHR plus CT over LCAHR alone. Considering the strength of the evidence, the results of this study indicate that this regimen would be a new promising modality worth further investigation.
ISSN:1759-7706
1759-7714
DOI:10.1111/j.1759-7714.2012.00166.x