A Response to Heshusius' “Curriculum-Based Assessment and Direct Instruction: Critical Reflections on Fundamental Assumptions”

A Response to Heshusius' “Curriculum-Based Assessment and Direct Instruction: Critical Reflections on Fundamental Assumptions”

This commentary on a paper by L. Heshusius (EC 600 327) argues that, rather than rejecting empiricism, postmechanistic science embraces a more sophisticated view of empiricism and scientific method. The commentary also supports direct instruction with the use of multiple measures of educational prog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Exceptional children 1992-03, Vol.58 (5), p.461-463
Hauptverfasser: Dixon, Robert C., Carnine, Douglas W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Curriculum Based Assessment
Direct Instruction
Disabilities
Educational Philosophy
Elementary Secondary Education
Evaluation Methods
Learning Theories
Scientific Methodology
Student Evaluation
Teaching Methods
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This commentary on a paper by L. Heshusius (EC 600 327) argues that, rather than rejecting empiricism, postmechanistic science embraces a more sophisticated view of empiricism and scientific method. The commentary also supports direct instruction with the use of multiple measures of educational progress, quantitative and qualitative alike. (JDD)
ISSN:0014-4029
2163-5560
DOI:10.1177/001440299205800509