Do We Need a Feminist Historiography of Geography. And If We Do, What Should It Be?
Domosh (1991) proposes that a specifically feminist historiography of geography needs to be developed. In support, in addition to general remarks about 'the post-modern turn', she cites several women travellers who made no contribution in their time to the emergence of the discipline and m...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Transactions - Institute of British Geographers (1965) 1991-01, Vol.16 (4), p.484-487 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 487 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 484 |
| container_title | Transactions - Institute of British Geographers (1965) |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Stoddart, David R. |
| description | Domosh (1991) proposes that a specifically feminist historiography of geography needs to be developed. In support, in addition to general remarks about 'the post-modern turn', she cites several women travellers who made no contribution in their time to the emergence of the discipline and most of whom are long forgotten. There are several mainstream women professional geographers who repay investigation, but there is no advantage in labelling such studies 'feminist' simply because the subjects are women. The case for a feminist historiography of geography has not been made. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/623032 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1299976580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>623032</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>623032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-a892ae3138c5358723cc0b2b4b39ddd53b8b5d4dd24a8661d19d910d8772cfbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIhALfYAmJEyl-xLF9QqWlD6mCQ0E9Ro7tkFRtXOzk0L8nUSpx4jKrWc3OagaAe4zGhCL-nHZIyQWIcMJZzNIUX4IIIYJiwllyDW5C2KGeIxqBzczBrYXv1hqo4NweqroKDVx24Hzlvr06lifoCriwZzKGk9rAVdGfzdwT3JaqgZvStftu28BX-3ILrgq1D_buPEfga_72OV3G64_FajpZx5pw3sRKSKIsxVRoRpnghGqNcpInOZXGGEZzkTOTGEMSJboUBksjMTKCc6KLXNMReBh8j979tDY02c61vu5eZphIKXnKBOpUj4NKexeCt0V29NVB-VOGUdYXlg2F_dnt-uz_qX4Bqm9kXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1299976580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do We Need a Feminist Historiography of Geography. And If We Do, What Should It Be?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Stoddart, David R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stoddart, David R.</creatorcontrib><description>Domosh (1991) proposes that a specifically feminist historiography of geography needs to be developed. In support, in addition to general remarks about 'the post-modern turn', she cites several women travellers who made no contribution in their time to the emergence of the discipline and most of whom are long forgotten. There are several mainstream women professional geographers who repay investigation, but there is no advantage in labelling such studies 'feminist' simply because the subjects are women. The case for a feminist historiography of geography has not been made.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-2754</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-5661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/623032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Institute of British Geographers</publisher><subject>Feminism ; Gender equality ; Geography ; Geography education ; History instruction ; Travel ; United States history ; Universities ; Victorians</subject><ispartof>Transactions - Institute of British Geographers (1965), 1991-01, Vol.16 (4), p.484-487</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 Institute of British Geographers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-a892ae3138c5358723cc0b2b4b39ddd53b8b5d4dd24a8661d19d910d8772cfbc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/623032$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/623032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stoddart, David R.</creatorcontrib><title>Do We Need a Feminist Historiography of Geography. And If We Do, What Should It Be?</title><title>Transactions - Institute of British Geographers (1965)</title><description>Domosh (1991) proposes that a specifically feminist historiography of geography needs to be developed. In support, in addition to general remarks about 'the post-modern turn', she cites several women travellers who made no contribution in their time to the emergence of the discipline and most of whom are long forgotten. There are several mainstream women professional geographers who repay investigation, but there is no advantage in labelling such studies 'feminist' simply because the subjects are women. The case for a feminist historiography of geography has not been made.</description><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender equality</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Geography education</subject><subject>History instruction</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>United States history</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Victorians</subject><issn>0020-2754</issn><issn>1475-5661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIhALfYAmJEyl-xLF9QqWlD6mCQ0E9Ro7tkFRtXOzk0L8nUSpx4jKrWc3OagaAe4zGhCL-nHZIyQWIcMJZzNIUX4IIIYJiwllyDW5C2KGeIxqBzczBrYXv1hqo4NweqroKDVx24Hzlvr06lifoCriwZzKGk9rAVdGfzdwT3JaqgZvStftu28BX-3ILrgq1D_buPEfga_72OV3G64_FajpZx5pw3sRKSKIsxVRoRpnghGqNcpInOZXGGEZzkTOTGEMSJboUBksjMTKCc6KLXNMReBh8j979tDY02c61vu5eZphIKXnKBOpUj4NKexeCt0V29NVB-VOGUdYXlg2F_dnt-uz_qX4Bqm9kXg</recordid><startdate>19910101</startdate><enddate>19910101</enddate><creator>Stoddart, David R.</creator><general>Institute of British Geographers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>HQAFP</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910101</creationdate><title>Do We Need a Feminist Historiography of Geography. And If We Do, What Should It Be?</title><author>Stoddart, David R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-a892ae3138c5358723cc0b2b4b39ddd53b8b5d4dd24a8661d19d910d8772cfbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender equality</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Geography education</topic><topic>History instruction</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>United States history</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Victorians</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stoddart, David R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 23</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Transactions - Institute of British Geographers (1965)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stoddart, David R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do We Need a Feminist Historiography of Geography. And If We Do, What Should It Be?</atitle><jtitle>Transactions - Institute of British Geographers (1965)</jtitle><date>1991-01-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>484</spage><epage>487</epage><pages>484-487</pages><issn>0020-2754</issn><eissn>1475-5661</eissn><abstract>Domosh (1991) proposes that a specifically feminist historiography of geography needs to be developed. In support, in addition to general remarks about 'the post-modern turn', she cites several women travellers who made no contribution in their time to the emergence of the discipline and most of whom are long forgotten. There are several mainstream women professional geographers who repay investigation, but there is no advantage in labelling such studies 'feminist' simply because the subjects are women. The case for a feminist historiography of geography has not been made.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Institute of British Geographers</pub><doi>10.2307/623032</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-2754 |
| ispartof | Transactions - Institute of British Geographers (1965), 1991-01, Vol.16 (4), p.484-487 |
| issn | 0020-2754 1475-5661 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1299976580 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Feminism Gender equality Geography Geography education History instruction Travel United States history Universities Victorians |
| title | Do We Need a Feminist Historiography of Geography. And If We Do, What Should It Be? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A31%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20We%20Need%20a%20Feminist%20Historiography%20of%20Geography.%20And%20If%20We%20Do,%20What%20Should%20It%20Be?&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20-%20Institute%20of%20British%20Geographers%20(1965)&rft.au=Stoddart,%20David%20R.&rft.date=1991-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=484&rft.epage=487&rft.pages=484-487&rft.issn=0020-2754&rft.eissn=1475-5661&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/623032&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E623032%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1299976580&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=623032&rfr_iscdi=true |