RESPONSE TO ROTTSCHAEFER, BECKLEY, AND KONNER
. All three articles properly locate my work as interactive between the sciences on the one hand and theology and ethics on the other. They disagree on whether tradition, science, or experience “trumps” the others when they conflict; Beckley shows the importance of tradition, which is slighted by th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zygon 1995-06, Vol.30 (2), p.221-226 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | . All three articles properly locate my work as interactive between the sciences on the one hand and theology and ethics on the other. They disagree on whether tradition, science, or experience “trumps” the others when they conflict; Beckley shows the importance of tradition, which is slighted by the other two. Comments on each article indicate where further discussion is needed and where I have learned from the authors or agree with them. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0591-2385 1467-9744 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1467-9744.1995.tb00066.x |