Effectiveness of Competition to Limit Rail Rate Increases Under Deregulation: The Case of Wheat Exports from the Southern Plains

Much of the early 1860s discontent with railroads was centered in agricultural regions, particularly the new regions of the West, where monopolistic price discrimination was most easily practiced by railroads. Because of unavailable or inaccessible forms of competing transportation and numerous smal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of agricultural and applied economics 1981-12, Vol.13 (2), p.11-19
Hauptverfasser: Fuller, Stephen, Shanmugham, C. V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Much of the early 1860s discontent with railroads was centered in agricultural regions, particularly the new regions of the West, where monopolistic price discrimination was most easily practiced by railroads. Because of unavailable or inaccessible forms of competing transportation and numerous small shippers, railroads were able to exploit their monopolistic position (Meyer et al.). Agrarian political action in the 1860s resulted in unsuccessful regulatory efforts by states, but laid the base for the cornerstone of federal transportation regulation, the Act to Regulate Commerce, which was passed in 1887. The Act requires that all rates be “just and reasonable” and provides that “every unjust and unreasonable charge” is unlawful.
ISSN:1074-0708
0081-3052
2056-7405
0081-3052
DOI:10.1017/S0081305200027229