Effectiveness of Governmental Operations

The Judiciary has always received a higher rating of esteem and regard than the other two branches of government. However, it is not free from pragmatic or philosophical operational problems. Two of these are finding a line between judging and legislating and court reform. Suggestions for reform fal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1976-07, Vol.426 (1), p.81-97
1. Verfasser: Abraham, Henry J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Judiciary has always received a higher rating of esteem and regard than the other two branches of government. However, it is not free from pragmatic or philosophical operational problems. Two of these are finding a line between judging and legislating and court reform. Suggestions for reform fall into three categories: (1) those dealing with the institution and modus operandus of the courts, (2) those concerned with court staff, and (3) those dealing with the legal framework mandated by lawmakers and the Constitution. A matter of infinitely more pressing concern is how to confine judges to judging rather than legislating. The Supreme Court must possess the power to interpret legislation, but a line must be drawn between the imposition of judicial judgment and the exercise of judicial will. Our federal system underlies both the disappointments and the accomplishments of the American government. The apparent trend toward centralization of federal power is both an axiom of modern American federalism and irreversible. However, since excessive rigidity of centralization is a weakness, regional, state, and local governments should retain a substantial sphere of independence.
ISSN:0002-7162
1552-3349
DOI:10.1177/000271627642600109