Perceptions of Research Misconduct and an Analysis of Their Correlates

Perceptions of Research Misconduct and an Analysis of Their Correlates

This article presents the results of research that identified five patterns of attitudes and beliefs individual biochemists hold toward taking action for scientific wrongdoing. The effects of intraprofessional status, departmental cohesion, institutional pressure for external grants, and professiona...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of higher education (Columbus) 1994-05, Vol.65 (3), p.351-372
Hauptverfasser: Braxton, John M., Bayer, Alan E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Academic departments
Attitudes
Beliefs
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Biochemistry
Biochemists
College faculty
College teachers
Etiquette
Fraud
Fraud in science
Grants
Higher Education
Research grants
Research Methodology
Research Misconduct
Research universities
Science fraud
Scientific belief
Scientific misconduct
Scientific Research
Scientists
Social Influences
Solidarity
Universities
Whistleblowing
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article presents the results of research that identified five patterns of attitudes and beliefs individual biochemists hold toward taking action for scientific wrongdoing. The effects of intraprofessional status, departmental cohesion, institutional pressure for external grants, and professional solidarity on these attitudes and beliefs are also presented.
ISSN:0022-1546
1538-4640
DOI:10.1080/00221546.1994.11778505