Bill C-20: An Evaluation from the Perspective of Current Transportation Policy and Regulatory Performance

Initially this paper offers historical perspective on the principles of transportation policy contained in the 1967 National Transportation Act. There follows an evaluation of the structure, conduct and performance of the Canadian Transport Commission in carrying out dual policy advisory and regulat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian public policy 1980-01, Vol.6 (1), p.47-62
Hauptverfasser: Chambers, E. J., Dunn, M. James, Gillen, David W., Tyndall, D. Gordon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 47
container_title Canadian public policy
container_volume 6
creator Chambers, E. J.
Dunn, M. James
Gillen, David W.
Tyndall, D. Gordon
description Initially this paper offers historical perspective on the principles of transportation policy contained in the 1967 National Transportation Act. There follows an evaluation of the structure, conduct and performance of the Canadian Transport Commission in carrying out dual policy advisory and regulatory roles. Certain deficiencies are identified in the NTA itself and in CTC conduct and performance. The latter part of the paper (i) considers the extent to which Bill C-20 is likely to remedy these deficiencies, and (ii) offers a proposal for restructuring the CTC to address regional as well as modal realities, and to better accommodate policy advisory and regulatory roles within a single agency. /// Cet article présente pour commencer une perspective historique des principes de la politique des transports contenue dans la Loi nationale sur les transports de 1967. Ensuite une évaluation de la structure, du comportement et de la performance de la Commission canadienne de transports en ce qui touche à son rôle double de conseiller politique et en réglementation. Certaines lacunes sont identifiées dans la Loi elle-même ainsi que dans le comportement et la performance de la CCT. La dernière partie de l'article (i) examine dans quelle mesure le projet de loi C-20 peut offrir un remède à ces lacunes, et (ii) propose une restructuration de la CCT afin de répondre aux réalités régionales ainsi que modales, et lui permettre de mieux remplir les rôles de conseil et de réglementation au sein d'une agence unique.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3550068
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1291841357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3550068</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3550068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1207-4f9da47bbc7a46592442e3a59bf4907e15f0d2b8bac701144d8944eba38dfc953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1LwzAUBuAgCs4p_oWAglfVc5pkabybZX7AwCHzuqRpoh1dM5N2sH9vR7316tw85z2cl5BrhPuUgXxgQgDMshMyQYWYKIXylEyAoUwgm-E5uYhxA8BAMTEh9VPdNDRPUnik85Yu9rrpdVf7lrrgt7T7tnRlQ9xZ09V7S72jeR-CbTu6DrqNOx-6ka98U5sD1W1FP-xX3-jOh8Nx1_mw1a2xl-TM6Sbaq785JZ_Pi3X-mizfX97y-TIxmIJMuFOV5rIsjdR8JlTKeWqZFqp0XIG0KBxUaZmV2khA5LzKFOe21CyrnFGCTcnNmLsL_qe3sSs2vg_tcLLAVGHGkQk5qLtRmeBjDNYVu1BvdTgUCMWxx-Kvx0HejnITh5f-Zb-rrG9W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291841357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bill C-20: An Evaluation from the Perspective of Current Transportation Policy and Regulatory Performance</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Chambers, E. J. ; Dunn, M. James ; Gillen, David W. ; Tyndall, D. Gordon</creator><creatorcontrib>Chambers, E. J. ; Dunn, M. James ; Gillen, David W. ; Tyndall, D. Gordon</creatorcontrib><description>Initially this paper offers historical perspective on the principles of transportation policy contained in the 1967 National Transportation Act. There follows an evaluation of the structure, conduct and performance of the Canadian Transport Commission in carrying out dual policy advisory and regulatory roles. Certain deficiencies are identified in the NTA itself and in CTC conduct and performance. The latter part of the paper (i) considers the extent to which Bill C-20 is likely to remedy these deficiencies, and (ii) offers a proposal for restructuring the CTC to address regional as well as modal realities, and to better accommodate policy advisory and regulatory roles within a single agency. /// Cet article présente pour commencer une perspective historique des principes de la politique des transports contenue dans la Loi nationale sur les transports de 1967. Ensuite une évaluation de la structure, du comportement et de la performance de la Commission canadienne de transports en ce qui touche à son rôle double de conseiller politique et en réglementation. Certaines lacunes sont identifiées dans la Loi elle-même ainsi que dans le comportement et la performance de la CCT. La dernière partie de l'article (i) examine dans quelle mesure le projet de loi C-20 peut offrir un remède à ces lacunes, et (ii) propose une restructuration de la CCT afin de répondre aux réalités régionales ainsi que modales, et lui permettre de mieux remplir les rôles de conseil et de réglementation au sein d'une agence unique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0317-0861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1911-9917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3550068</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Downsview, Ont: University of Toronto Press</publisher><subject>Administrative agencies ; Economic regulation ; Freight transport ; Government regulation ; Industrial regulation ; Rail freight ; Transportation ; Transportation costs ; Transportation policy ; Transportation regulation</subject><ispartof>Canadian public policy, 1980-01, Vol.6 (1), p.47-62</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1980 Canadian Public Policy - Analyse de Politiques</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3550068$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3550068$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chambers, E. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, M. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillen, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyndall, D. Gordon</creatorcontrib><title>Bill C-20: An Evaluation from the Perspective of Current Transportation Policy and Regulatory Performance</title><title>Canadian public policy</title><description>Initially this paper offers historical perspective on the principles of transportation policy contained in the 1967 National Transportation Act. There follows an evaluation of the structure, conduct and performance of the Canadian Transport Commission in carrying out dual policy advisory and regulatory roles. Certain deficiencies are identified in the NTA itself and in CTC conduct and performance. The latter part of the paper (i) considers the extent to which Bill C-20 is likely to remedy these deficiencies, and (ii) offers a proposal for restructuring the CTC to address regional as well as modal realities, and to better accommodate policy advisory and regulatory roles within a single agency. /// Cet article présente pour commencer une perspective historique des principes de la politique des transports contenue dans la Loi nationale sur les transports de 1967. Ensuite une évaluation de la structure, du comportement et de la performance de la Commission canadienne de transports en ce qui touche à son rôle double de conseiller politique et en réglementation. Certaines lacunes sont identifiées dans la Loi elle-même ainsi que dans le comportement et la performance de la CCT. La dernière partie de l'article (i) examine dans quelle mesure le projet de loi C-20 peut offrir un remède à ces lacunes, et (ii) propose une restructuration de la CCT afin de répondre aux réalités régionales ainsi que modales, et lui permettre de mieux remplir les rôles de conseil et de réglementation au sein d'une agence unique.</description><subject>Administrative agencies</subject><subject>Economic regulation</subject><subject>Freight transport</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Industrial regulation</subject><subject>Rail freight</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Transportation costs</subject><subject>Transportation policy</subject><subject>Transportation regulation</subject><issn>0317-0861</issn><issn>1911-9917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10F1LwzAUBuAgCs4p_oWAglfVc5pkabybZX7AwCHzuqRpoh1dM5N2sH9vR7316tw85z2cl5BrhPuUgXxgQgDMshMyQYWYKIXylEyAoUwgm-E5uYhxA8BAMTEh9VPdNDRPUnik85Yu9rrpdVf7lrrgt7T7tnRlQ9xZ09V7S72jeR-CbTu6DrqNOx-6ka98U5sD1W1FP-xX3-jOh8Nx1_mw1a2xl-TM6Sbaq785JZ_Pi3X-mizfX97y-TIxmIJMuFOV5rIsjdR8JlTKeWqZFqp0XIG0KBxUaZmV2khA5LzKFOe21CyrnFGCTcnNmLsL_qe3sSs2vg_tcLLAVGHGkQk5qLtRmeBjDNYVu1BvdTgUCMWxx-Kvx0HejnITh5f-Zb-rrG9W</recordid><startdate>19800101</startdate><enddate>19800101</enddate><creator>Chambers, E. J.</creator><creator>Dunn, M. James</creator><creator>Gillen, David W.</creator><creator>Tyndall, D. Gordon</creator><general>University of Toronto Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19800101</creationdate><title>Bill C-20: An Evaluation from the Perspective of Current Transportation Policy and Regulatory Performance</title><author>Chambers, E. J. ; Dunn, M. James ; Gillen, David W. ; Tyndall, D. Gordon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1207-4f9da47bbc7a46592442e3a59bf4907e15f0d2b8bac701144d8944eba38dfc953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Administrative agencies</topic><topic>Economic regulation</topic><topic>Freight transport</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Industrial regulation</topic><topic>Rail freight</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Transportation costs</topic><topic>Transportation policy</topic><topic>Transportation regulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chambers, E. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, M. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillen, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyndall, D. Gordon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Canadian public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chambers, E. J.</au><au>Dunn, M. James</au><au>Gillen, David W.</au><au>Tyndall, D. Gordon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bill C-20: An Evaluation from the Perspective of Current Transportation Policy and Regulatory Performance</atitle><jtitle>Canadian public policy</jtitle><date>1980-01-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>47-62</pages><issn>0317-0861</issn><eissn>1911-9917</eissn><abstract>Initially this paper offers historical perspective on the principles of transportation policy contained in the 1967 National Transportation Act. There follows an evaluation of the structure, conduct and performance of the Canadian Transport Commission in carrying out dual policy advisory and regulatory roles. Certain deficiencies are identified in the NTA itself and in CTC conduct and performance. The latter part of the paper (i) considers the extent to which Bill C-20 is likely to remedy these deficiencies, and (ii) offers a proposal for restructuring the CTC to address regional as well as modal realities, and to better accommodate policy advisory and regulatory roles within a single agency. /// Cet article présente pour commencer une perspective historique des principes de la politique des transports contenue dans la Loi nationale sur les transports de 1967. Ensuite une évaluation de la structure, du comportement et de la performance de la Commission canadienne de transports en ce qui touche à son rôle double de conseiller politique et en réglementation. Certaines lacunes sont identifiées dans la Loi elle-même ainsi que dans le comportement et la performance de la CCT. La dernière partie de l'article (i) examine dans quelle mesure le projet de loi C-20 peut offrir un remède à ces lacunes, et (ii) propose une restructuration de la CCT afin de répondre aux réalités régionales ainsi que modales, et lui permettre de mieux remplir les rôles de conseil et de réglementation au sein d'une agence unique.</abstract><cop>Downsview, Ont</cop><pub>University of Toronto Press</pub><doi>10.2307/3550068</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0317-0861
ispartof Canadian public policy, 1980-01, Vol.6 (1), p.47-62
issn 0317-0861
1911-9917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1291841357
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Administrative agencies
Economic regulation
Freight transport
Government regulation
Industrial regulation
Rail freight
Transportation
Transportation costs
Transportation policy
Transportation regulation
title Bill C-20: An Evaluation from the Perspective of Current Transportation Policy and Regulatory Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A27%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bill%20C-20:%20An%20Evaluation%20from%20the%20Perspective%20of%20Current%20Transportation%20Policy%20and%20Regulatory%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20public%20policy&rft.au=Chambers,%20E.%20J.&rft.date=1980-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=47-62&rft.issn=0317-0861&rft.eissn=1911-9917&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3550068&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3550068%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291841357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3550068&rfr_iscdi=true