Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: A Suggested Analysis

Professors von Mehren and Trautman believe that the traditional analysis of the problem of adjudicatory jurisdiction in terms of jurisdiction "in personam," "in rem," and "quasi in rem" makes it difficult to focus on the policy considerations that should underlie assert...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Harvard law review 1966-04, Vol.79 (6), p.1121-1179
Hauptverfasser: von Mehren, Arthur T., Trautman, Donald T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Professors von Mehren and Trautman believe that the traditional analysis of the problem of adjudicatory jurisdiction in terms of jurisdiction "in personam," "in rem," and "quasi in rem" makes it difficult to focus on the policy considerations that should underlie assertions of jurisdiction. Since current terminology is overly conceptual and encourages confusion of the jurisdictional issue with other, separable problems, the authors propose a new system of terminology that they feel will encourage clearer thinking about the functional problems in this area of the law. Current decisional trends are analyzed in these terms, and the authors conclude by suggesting desirable lines for future development in both case and statutory law.
ISSN:0017-811X
DOI:10.2307/1339200