A Comparative Test of Magnitude Estimation and Pair-Comparison Treatment of Complete Ranks for Scaling a Small Number of Equal-Interval Frequency Response Anchors

A Comparative Test of Magnitude Estimation and Pair-Comparison Treatment of Complete Ranks for Scaling a Small Number of Equal-Interval Frequency Response Anchors

Whether previously noted differences in 2 sets of recommended 5-point equal-interval response anchors could have been caused by scaling too many stimuli at once was studied for scores of 110 college students. A comparison of Magnitude Estimation (MET) and Thurstone Case III illustrates the advantage...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational and psychological measurement 1992-12, Vol.52 (4), p.867-877
Hauptverfasser: Schriesheim, Chester A, Gardiner, Claudia C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Anchor Effects
Biological and medical sciences
College Students
Comparative Analysis
Equal Interval Scoring
Estimation (Mathematics)
Frequency Analysis
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Higher Education
Magnitude Estimations
Paired Comparisons
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology
Responses
Scaling
Scores
Scoring
Statistics. Mathematics
Thurstone Model III Scaling Procedure
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Whether previously noted differences in 2 sets of recommended 5-point equal-interval response anchors could have been caused by scaling too many stimuli at once was studied for scores of 110 college students. A comparison of Magnitude Estimation (MET) and Thurstone Case III illustrates the advantages of MET. (SLD)
ISSN:0013-1644
1552-3888
DOI:10.1177/0013164492052004006