Empirical Choice Weighting Under "Guess" and "Do Not Guess" Directions

This study investigated reliability and validity of scores resulting from empirical choice-weighting under two conditions: (1) examinees were told not to guess when unable to eliminate any choice and (2) they were told their scores would be the number of right responses. Unlike other choice-weightin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational and psychological measurement 1978-10, Vol.38 (3), p.613-620
Hauptverfasser: Cross, Lawrence H., Frary, Robert B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study investigated reliability and validity of scores resulting from empirical choice-weighting under two conditions: (1) examinees were told not to guess when unable to eliminate any choice and (2) they were told their scores would be the number of right responses. Unlike other choice-weighting studies which have reported disappointing results under one or the other of these two conditions, the present study used a predictor and criterion which were obtained independently yet had a substantial logical relationship. The results indicated that choice-weighting resulted in substantial increases in score reliability and predictive validity over number-right and corrected-for-guessing scores. Moreover, the validity coefficients associated with choice-weighted scores obtained under "Guess" directions were comparable to coefficients obtained under "Do Not Guess" directions. This latter result led to a recommendation against instruction to restrict guessing under choice-weighted scoring.
ISSN:0013-1644
1552-3888
DOI:10.1177/001316447803800302