Further comment on classical and instrumental conditioning

Hebb's interesting discussion approaches but skirts an intriguing relation between instrumental and classical conditioning often considered but not yet explicitly stated. The Pavlovian procedure of using UCS to elicit a response which then can occur to CS is considered by Hebb to be actually an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Journal of Psychology 1959-01, Vol.13 (4), p.288-288
1. Verfasser: Berkun, Mitchell M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Hebb's interesting discussion approaches but skirts an intriguing relation between instrumental and classical conditioning often considered but not yet explicitly stated. The Pavlovian procedure of using UCS to elicit a response which then can occur to CS is considered by Hebb to be actually an example of instrumental learning. That is, UCS becomes a reinforcement as a direct result of the response; therefore, the response is acquired by reinforcement. This distinction will apply when considering aversive conditioning. But a heuristic advantage may lie in considering that the principle of control of behaviour by discriminative stimuli and by varying the schedule of reinforcement may apply equally well to both classical and instrumental conditioning situations.
ISSN:0008-4255
1196-1961
1878-7290
DOI:10.1037/h0084007