Dr. Soundbite: The Making of an Expert Source in Science and Medical Stories
Bioethicists have been increasingly used as expert sources in science and medical stories involving ethical issues. This case study examines how and why one bioethicist, Dr. Arthur L. Caplan, has become so ubiquitous. Organizational news routines provide the theoretical framework for a newspaper con...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science communication 2012-10, Vol.34 (5), p.566-591 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Bioethicists have been increasingly used as expert sources in science and medical stories involving ethical issues. This case study examines how and why one bioethicist, Dr. Arthur L. Caplan, has become so ubiquitous. Organizational news routines provide the theoretical framework for a newspaper content analysis and interviews. As part of journalists’ small roster of trusted experts, Caplan has been the de facto bioethics representative for two decades, helping shape media discourse on bioethical issues. Caplan understands news routines, provides pithy quotes, and supports public engagement. Critics worry, however, that news consumers may conflate Caplan’s opinions with “the” ethical position. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1075-5470 1552-8545 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1075547011434991 |