Sympathetic States: Explaining the Russian and Chinese Responses September 11
Hall talks about international leaders finding themselves formulation policy under such circumstances in the direct aftermath of September 11. Hall looks at the behavior of two states in particular-the Russian Federation (RF) and the People's Republic of China (PRC)-to explore how their respect...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Political science quarterly 2012-09, Vol.127 (3), p.369-400 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 400 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 369 |
| container_title | Political science quarterly |
| container_volume | 127 |
| creator | HALL, TODD |
| description | Hall talks about international leaders finding themselves formulation policy under such circumstances in the direct aftermath of September 11. Hall looks at the behavior of two states in particular-the Russian Federation (RF) and the People's Republic of China (PRC)-to explore how their respective leaders chose to act toward the United States. Given that the RF and the PRC were regional great powers with security concerns both vis-a-vis the United States and Central Asia, their behavior in this instance should not be exempt from the claims of mainstream international relations theory. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2012.tb00731.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1082019219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A303641329</galeid><jstor_id>23563182</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A303641329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6181-2277fbba8a8ac40ea87137ada29fad1f55762fa0a6f2da7641ef32c9256a64993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkk-P0zAQxSMEEmXhIyBFcOKQ4D9NnOwFrardslJpFwpib9Y0GWcd0iRru6L99jhqVahUIYgPsTy_9-wZvSB4Q0lMCWHv65gmPItomtzHjFAWuxUhgtN4-yQYHUtPgxEhnEWc5snz4IW1NfGfoGwUfFru1j24B3S6CJcOHNrL8HrbN6Bb3Vahr4RfNtZqaENoy3DyoFu0_gxt37UWbbjE3uF6hSak9GXwTEFj8dXhfxF8u7n-OvkYzRbT28nVLCpSmtGIMSHUagWZX8WYIGSCcgElsFxBSVWSiJQpIJAqVoJIxxQVZ0XOkhTScZ7zi-Dt3rc33eMGrZN1tzGtv1JSkvlB5Iz-QVXQoNSt6pyBYq1tIa844d6Ws4GKzlAVtmig6VpU2h-f8PEZ3q8S17o4K3h3IvCMw62rwI9V3i7n_8xm09nfHn5gi65psELpBz5ZnPKXe74wnbUGleyNXoPZ-ZnJIU2ylkNk5BAZOaRJHtIkt178YS_-6bvb_YdS3i1mn_3OO7zeO9TWdebowHiScpqx3-1o69s41sH8kKngIpHf51NJsjm9T--YvOG_AEWi5Pc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1082019219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sympathetic States: Explaining the Russian and Chinese Responses September 11</title><source>Columbia International Affairs Online Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>HALL, TODD</creator><creatorcontrib>HALL, TODD</creatorcontrib><description>Hall talks about international leaders finding themselves formulation policy under such circumstances in the direct aftermath of September 11. Hall looks at the behavior of two states in particular-the Russian Federation (RF) and the People's Republic of China (PRC)-to explore how their respective leaders chose to act toward the United States. Given that the RF and the PRC were regional great powers with security concerns both vis-a-vis the United States and Central Asia, their behavior in this instance should not be exempt from the claims of mainstream international relations theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-165X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2012.tb00731.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSCQAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Armed forces ; Chinese foreign relations ; Constructivism ; Constructivism (Political science) ; Cooperation ; Emotion ; Emotional expression ; Emotional states ; Emotions ; Foreign policy ; Gestures ; Great powers ; International communication ; International communications ; International cooperation ; International relations ; International relations-US ; Methods ; Military aspects ; Missile defense ; Multipolarity ; National security ; Natural disasters ; Political rhetoric ; Realism ; Russian foreign relations ; September 11 terrorist attacks-2001 ; Socialization ; Sympathy ; Terrorism</subject><ispartof>Political science quarterly, 2012-09, Vol.127 (3), p.369-400</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Academy of Political Science</rights><rights>2012 The Academy of Political Science</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Academy of Political Science Fall 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6181-2277fbba8a8ac40ea87137ada29fad1f55762fa0a6f2da7641ef32c9256a64993</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fj.1538-165X.2012.tb00731.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fj.1538-165X.2012.tb00731.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HALL, TODD</creatorcontrib><title>Sympathetic States: Explaining the Russian and Chinese Responses September 11</title><title>Political science quarterly</title><addtitle>Political Science Quarterly</addtitle><description>Hall talks about international leaders finding themselves formulation policy under such circumstances in the direct aftermath of September 11. Hall looks at the behavior of two states in particular-the Russian Federation (RF) and the People's Republic of China (PRC)-to explore how their respective leaders chose to act toward the United States. Given that the RF and the PRC were regional great powers with security concerns both vis-a-vis the United States and Central Asia, their behavior in this instance should not be exempt from the claims of mainstream international relations theory.</description><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Chinese foreign relations</subject><subject>Constructivism</subject><subject>Constructivism (Political science)</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Emotion</subject><subject>Emotional expression</subject><subject>Emotional states</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Gestures</subject><subject>Great powers</subject><subject>International communication</subject><subject>International communications</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Military aspects</subject><subject>Missile defense</subject><subject>Multipolarity</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Natural disasters</subject><subject>Political rhetoric</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Russian foreign relations</subject><subject>September 11 terrorist attacks-2001</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Sympathy</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><issn>0032-3195</issn><issn>1538-165X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkk-P0zAQxSMEEmXhIyBFcOKQ4D9NnOwFrardslJpFwpib9Y0GWcd0iRru6L99jhqVahUIYgPsTy_9-wZvSB4Q0lMCWHv65gmPItomtzHjFAWuxUhgtN4-yQYHUtPgxEhnEWc5snz4IW1NfGfoGwUfFru1j24B3S6CJcOHNrL8HrbN6Bb3Vahr4RfNtZqaENoy3DyoFu0_gxt37UWbbjE3uF6hSak9GXwTEFj8dXhfxF8u7n-OvkYzRbT28nVLCpSmtGIMSHUagWZX8WYIGSCcgElsFxBSVWSiJQpIJAqVoJIxxQVZ0XOkhTScZ7zi-Dt3rc33eMGrZN1tzGtv1JSkvlB5Iz-QVXQoNSt6pyBYq1tIa844d6Ws4GKzlAVtmig6VpU2h-f8PEZ3q8S17o4K3h3IvCMw62rwI9V3i7n_8xm09nfHn5gi65psELpBz5ZnPKXe74wnbUGleyNXoPZ-ZnJIU2ylkNk5BAZOaRJHtIkt178YS_-6bvb_YdS3i1mn_3OO7zeO9TWdebowHiScpqx3-1o69s41sH8kKngIpHf51NJsjm9T--YvOG_AEWi5Pc</recordid><startdate>20120922</startdate><enddate>20120922</enddate><creator>HALL, TODD</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Academy of Political Science</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120922</creationdate><title>Sympathetic States: Explaining the Russian and Chinese Responses September 11</title><author>HALL, TODD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6181-2277fbba8a8ac40ea87137ada29fad1f55762fa0a6f2da7641ef32c9256a64993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Chinese foreign relations</topic><topic>Constructivism</topic><topic>Constructivism (Political science)</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Emotion</topic><topic>Emotional expression</topic><topic>Emotional states</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Gestures</topic><topic>Great powers</topic><topic>International communication</topic><topic>International communications</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Military aspects</topic><topic>Missile defense</topic><topic>Multipolarity</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Natural disasters</topic><topic>Political rhetoric</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Russian foreign relations</topic><topic>September 11 terrorist attacks-2001</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Sympathy</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HALL, TODD</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><jtitle>Political science quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HALL, TODD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sympathetic States: Explaining the Russian and Chinese Responses September 11</atitle><jtitle>Political science quarterly</jtitle><addtitle>Political Science Quarterly</addtitle><date>2012-09-22</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>369-400</pages><issn>0032-3195</issn><eissn>1538-165X</eissn><coden>PSCQAB</coden><abstract>Hall talks about international leaders finding themselves formulation policy under such circumstances in the direct aftermath of September 11. Hall looks at the behavior of two states in particular-the Russian Federation (RF) and the People's Republic of China (PRC)-to explore how their respective leaders chose to act toward the United States. Given that the RF and the PRC were regional great powers with security concerns both vis-a-vis the United States and Central Asia, their behavior in this instance should not be exempt from the claims of mainstream international relations theory.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/j.1538-165X.2012.tb00731.x</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0032-3195 |
| ispartof | Political science quarterly, 2012-09, Vol.127 (3), p.369-400 |
| issn | 0032-3195 1538-165X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1082019219 |
| source | Columbia International Affairs Online Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Armed forces Chinese foreign relations Constructivism Constructivism (Political science) Cooperation Emotion Emotional expression Emotional states Emotions Foreign policy Gestures Great powers International communication International communications International cooperation International relations International relations-US Methods Military aspects Missile defense Multipolarity National security Natural disasters Political rhetoric Realism Russian foreign relations September 11 terrorist attacks-2001 Socialization Sympathy Terrorism |
| title | Sympathetic States: Explaining the Russian and Chinese Responses September 11 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A49%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sympathetic%20States:%20Explaining%20the%20Russian%20and%20Chinese%20Responses%20September%2011&rft.jtitle=Political%20science%20quarterly&rft.au=HALL,%20TODD&rft.date=2012-09-22&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=369-400&rft.issn=0032-3195&rft.eissn=1538-165X&rft.coden=PSCQAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2012.tb00731.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA303641329%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1082019219&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A303641329&rft_jstor_id=23563182&rfr_iscdi=true |