Erratum: BAP1 loss defines a new class of renal cell carcinoma
Nat. Genet. 44, 751–759 (2012); published online 10 June 2012; corrected after print 21 June 2012 In the version of this article initially published, the P value given in the abstract for the anticorrelation between BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations was given incorrectly as 9 × 10−6 instead of 3 × 10−5. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature genetics 2012-09, Vol.44 (9), p.1072-1072 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Nat. Genet. 44, 751–759 (2012); published online 10 June 2012; corrected after print 21 June 2012 In the version of this article initially published, the P value given in the abstract for the anticorrelation between BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations was given incorrectly as 9 × 10−6 instead of 3 × 10−5. The definition of mutant allele ratios (MARs) in the text on p. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1061-4036 1546-1718 |
DOI: | 10.1038/ng0912-1072b |