Is there a role for fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules?
Similar findings to those of our study [1] suggesting that fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) is both insensitive and unspecific for evaluating indeterminate thyroid nodules have also been recently reported by Smith et al [2]. The argument of "s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of otolaryngology 2009-07, Vol.30 (4), p.292-293 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Similar findings to those of our study [1] suggesting that fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) is both insensitive and unspecific for evaluating indeterminate thyroid nodules have also been recently reported by Smith et al [2]. The argument of "size of the cancerous lesion" however does not completely explain the high false-negative results (eg, patient 1 had a negative FDG-PET/CT scan and a 1.4-cm solid papillary carcinoma). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0196-0709 1532-818X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.06.018 |