Editorial
According to him, the theologians' way of argumentation fell short of leading to certainty in faith; even when it does, it entails some elements of doubt and taqlid (blind imitation), as their proofs are not demonstrative but dialectical the premises of which the theologians adapted from their...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Intellectual discourse 2012-01, Vol.20 (1), p.1 |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | According to him, the theologians' way of argumentation fell short of leading to certainty in faith; even when it does, it entails some elements of doubt and taqlid (blind imitation), as their proofs are not demonstrative but dialectical the premises of which the theologians adapted from their opponents. According to the author, Ataturk's model failed the cultural aspiration of the people and the "conservative democracy" model creates ambiguity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0128-4878 |