P-321: Us spending on diuretics directly predicts esrd incidence changes in a time-lagged fashion

We have previously reported a direct association between diuretic use in the US and incidence changes in renal failure. The previous reports were based upon observed percentage changes in spending on diuretic therapy and percentage changes in the annual incident rate of renal failure. This report is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hypertension 2004-05, Vol.17 (S1), p.152A-152A
Hauptverfasser: Hawkins, Ralph G., Houston, Mark C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We have previously reported a direct association between diuretic use in the US and incidence changes in renal failure. The previous reports were based upon observed percentage changes in spending on diuretic therapy and percentage changes in the annual incident rate of renal failure. This report is intended to simplify the previous relationship by correlating the annual percent changes in renal failure incidence with the total annual expenditure for diuretics in the United States (in $US). Renal failure rates as reported by the United States Renal Data Service (USRDS) were analyzed. Annual changes in incidence were expressed as percent changes. IMS Health reports total American spending on diuretics in US dollars. These data were subjected to regression analysis. Linear regression analysis identifies a significant direct correlation exists between global US diuretic spending and the incidence rate changes for renal failure time-lagged 4 years later (r=0.74864, p=0.0319). Although a significant linear relationship can be demonstrated, analysis demonstrates a significant departure from linearity requiring analysis of a curvilinear relationship. A second degree equation exists opening upwards (r=0.82354, p=0.0191) indicating that renal failure incidence rises as total diuretic spending in the United States rises, and that renal failure incidence rises more precipitously as total American diuretic expenditures rise above $535.6 Million. Analysis of 1999 prescribing behavior demonstrates that of total number of prescriptions in the US for diuretics, 55% were for hydrochlorothiazide and 45% were for loop diuretics, predominantly furosemide. While HCTZ accounted for 55% of diuretic prescriptions in 1999, it accounted for only 45% of total diuretic expenditure. Analysis of year 2000 data for new prescriptions identifies that 55% of new diuretic prescriptions were for HCTZ and 45% were for loop diuretics. Changes in renal failure incidence in the United States directly correlate to overall US spending on diuretic therapy, time-lagged by 4 years. The predominant diuretic prescribed in the United States during the time frame of this analysis was HCTZ. Recent reports suggest that new diuretic prescriptions have expanded by over 20% abruptly following the report of the ALLHAT trial findings. This analysis predicts that an abrupt increase in renal failure incidence in 2007 will be the result of this altered prescribing behavior. Am J Hypertens (2004) 17, 152A–152A; doi
ISSN:0895-7061
1941-7225
DOI:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.03.396