What Boards Should Do, but Likely Won’t
Even when directors and managers are able to identify disruptive change, they rarely act on it. Yet directors have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that the company is a going concern, to protect its assets, and to create long-term value for its stakeholders. They must exercise judgment on such...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buchkapitel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Even when directors and managers are able to identify disruptive change, they rarely act on it. Yet directors have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that the company is a going concern, to protect its assets, and to create long-term value for its stakeholders. They must exercise judgment on such critical dimensions as overall corporate strategy, risk versus reward, short-term versus long-term interests, effective oversight versus motivating management, ethical considerations versus market practices in different jurisdictions, and balancing the interests of competing stakeholders.¹ I refer to all these activities as strategic governance.
Strategic governance doesn’t simply happen. In order for a |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.3138/9781442621374-006 |