What Boards Should Do, but Likely Won’t

Even when directors and managers are able to identify disruptive change, they rarely act on it. Yet directors have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that the company is a going concern, to protect its assets, and to create long-term value for its stakeholders. They must exercise judgment on such...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Meredith, Patricia
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Even when directors and managers are able to identify disruptive change, they rarely act on it. Yet directors have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that the company is a going concern, to protect its assets, and to create long-term value for its stakeholders. They must exercise judgment on such critical dimensions as overall corporate strategy, risk versus reward, short-term versus long-term interests, effective oversight versus motivating management, ethical considerations versus market practices in different jurisdictions, and balancing the interests of competing stakeholders.¹ I refer to all these activities as strategic governance. Strategic governance doesn’t simply happen. In order for a
DOI:10.3138/9781442621374-006