Generic saturation
Assuming that ORD is ω + ω-Erdös we show that if a class forcing amenable to L (an L-forcing) has a generic then it has one definable in a set-generic extension of L [ O # ]. In fact we may choose such a generic to be periodic in the sense that it preserve the indiscernibility of a final segment of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of symbolic logic 1998-03, Vol.63 (1), p.158-162 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Assuming that ORD is ω + ω-Erdös we show that if a class forcing amenable to
L
(an L-forcing) has a generic then it has one definable in a set-generic extension of
L
[
O
#
]. In fact we may choose such a generic to be
periodic
in the sense that it preserve the indiscernibility of a final segment of a periodic subclass of the Silver indiscernibles, and therefore to be
almost codable
in the sense that it is definable from a real which is generic for an
L
-forcing (and which belongs to a set-generic extension of
L
[
0
#
]). This result is best possible in the sense that for any countable ordinal α there is an
L
-forcing which has generics but none periodic of period ≤ α. However, we do not know if an assumption beyond ZFC+“
O
#
exists” is actually necessary for these results.
Let
P
denote a class forcing definable over an amenable ground model 〈
L
,
A
〉 and assume that
O
#
exists.
D
efinition
.
P
is
relevant
if
P
has a generic definable in
L
[
0
#
].
P
is
almost relevant
if
P
has a generic definable in a set-generic extension of
L
[
0
#
].
R
emark
. The reverse Easton product of Cohen forcings 2 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4812 1943-5886 |
DOI: | 10.2307/2586594 |