Minimal upper bounds for arithmetical degrees

This paper was inspired by Lerman [14] in which he proved various properties of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. The degrees which are upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees were first studied by Hodes [5] and Enderton and Putnam [5]. Enderton and Putnam [5] showed that if a is an upper...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of symbolic logic 1994-06, Vol.59 (2), p.516-528
1. Verfasser: Kumabe, Masahiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 528
container_issue 2
container_start_page 516
container_title The Journal of symbolic logic
container_volume 59
creator Kumabe, Masahiro
description This paper was inspired by Lerman [14] in which he proved various properties of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. The degrees which are upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees were first studied by Hodes [5] and Enderton and Putnam [5]. Enderton and Putnam [5] showed that if a is an upper bound for the arithmetical degrees, then a (2) ≥ 0 ( ω ) . This area was further studied by Hodes [5], Knight, Lachlan and Soare [12], Jockusch and Simpson [12], and Sacks [17]. Enderton and Putnam [5] and Sacks [17] have combined to show that 0 ( ω ) is the least degree in { a (2) : a is an upper bound for the arithmetical degrees}. So there seem to be some analogies between the degrees of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees and the degrees below 0 (2) . But Sacks [17] showed an important difference between these two structures; namely, the Turing jumps of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees have no least element. In Lerman [14], a systematic investigation of properties of the jumps of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees was suggested, which could lead to a definition of the jump operator over the elementary theory of the partial ordering of the degrees. Although Cooper [5] found a degree-theoretic definition of the jump operator, Lerman's plan is still interesting. We say a degree a is generic if there is a representative A of a such that A is Cohen generic for the arithmetical sentences. By Jockusch [5], the statement that A is Cohen generic for the arithmetical sentences is equivalent to saying that for any arithmetical set S of binary strings, there is a σ extended by A such that σ is in S or no extension of σ is in S . First, we investigate the relation between generic degrees and upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. In the case D (≤ 0′), the set of degrees below 0′, it is well known that any nonrecursive r.e. degree bounds a 1-generic degree (Cohen generic for Σ 1 sentences). Jockusch and Ponser [12] showed that any degree a with a ″ > T ( a ∪ 0′)′ bounds a 1-generic degree.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2275404
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proje</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_projecteuclid_primary_oai_CULeuclid_euclid_jsl_1183744494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2275404</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2275404</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b11bdd3459a4d42fd6acf3189e991642ef4e8c6bdc8280101a6169f4b10e9e343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFbxLwQUfIruLXt5U6q2QlWEFh-XTXaiiWkTdxPQf29KQh99OjDzcebMQeic4GvKsLyhVCYc8wM0IZqzOFFKHKIJxpTGXBF6jE5CKDHGieZqguLnYltsbBV1TQM-Sutu60KU1z6yvmg_N9AWWb918OEBwik6ym0V4GzUKVo_Pqxmi3j5On-a3S3jjEnWxikhqXOMJ9pyx2nuhM1yRpQGrYngFHIOKhOpyxRVmGBiBRE65ynBoIFxNkW3g2_j6xKyFrqsKpxpfB_V_5raFma2Xo7TUcpQGUIUk5xzvbO42Ft8dxBaU9ad3_apDaG6_55KTnvqaqAyX4fgId_fINjs6jRjnT15OZBlaGv_DxYPWBFa-Nlj1n8ZIZlMjJi_GfGiV_J9cW9m7A-ZkIAb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290592742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimal upper bounds for arithmetical degrees</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics and Statistics</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Kumabe, Masahiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumabe, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><description>This paper was inspired by Lerman [14] in which he proved various properties of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. The degrees which are upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees were first studied by Hodes [5] and Enderton and Putnam [5]. Enderton and Putnam [5] showed that if a is an upper bound for the arithmetical degrees, then a (2) ≥ 0 ( ω ) . This area was further studied by Hodes [5], Knight, Lachlan and Soare [12], Jockusch and Simpson [12], and Sacks [17]. Enderton and Putnam [5] and Sacks [17] have combined to show that 0 ( ω ) is the least degree in { a (2) : a is an upper bound for the arithmetical degrees}. So there seem to be some analogies between the degrees of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees and the degrees below 0 (2) . But Sacks [17] showed an important difference between these two structures; namely, the Turing jumps of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees have no least element. In Lerman [14], a systematic investigation of properties of the jumps of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees was suggested, which could lead to a definition of the jump operator over the elementary theory of the partial ordering of the degrees. Although Cooper [5] found a degree-theoretic definition of the jump operator, Lerman's plan is still interesting. We say a degree a is generic if there is a representative A of a such that A is Cohen generic for the arithmetical sentences. By Jockusch [5], the statement that A is Cohen generic for the arithmetical sentences is equivalent to saying that for any arithmetical set S of binary strings, there is a σ extended by A such that σ is in S or no extension of σ is in S . First, we investigate the relation between generic degrees and upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. In the case D (≤ 0′), the set of degrees below 0′, it is well known that any nonrecursive r.e. degree bounds a 1-generic degree (Cohen generic for Σ 1 sentences). Jockusch and Ponser [12] showed that any degree a with a ″ &gt; T ( a ∪ 0′)′ bounds a 1-generic degree.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5886</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2275404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Degree of unsolvability ; Induction assumption ; Mathematical functions ; Mathematical induction ; Mathematical logic ; Mathematical theorems ; Natural numbers ; Number theoretic functions ; Oracles</subject><ispartof>The Journal of symbolic logic, 1994-06, Vol.59 (2), p.516-528</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 Association for Symbolic Logic, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 1994 Association for Symbolic Logic</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b11bdd3459a4d42fd6acf3189e991642ef4e8c6bdc8280101a6169f4b10e9e343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b11bdd3459a4d42fd6acf3189e991642ef4e8c6bdc8280101a6169f4b10e9e343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2275404$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2275404$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,804,833,886,27871,27926,27927,58019,58023,58252,58256</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumabe, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><title>Minimal upper bounds for arithmetical degrees</title><title>The Journal of symbolic logic</title><description>This paper was inspired by Lerman [14] in which he proved various properties of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. The degrees which are upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees were first studied by Hodes [5] and Enderton and Putnam [5]. Enderton and Putnam [5] showed that if a is an upper bound for the arithmetical degrees, then a (2) ≥ 0 ( ω ) . This area was further studied by Hodes [5], Knight, Lachlan and Soare [12], Jockusch and Simpson [12], and Sacks [17]. Enderton and Putnam [5] and Sacks [17] have combined to show that 0 ( ω ) is the least degree in { a (2) : a is an upper bound for the arithmetical degrees}. So there seem to be some analogies between the degrees of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees and the degrees below 0 (2) . But Sacks [17] showed an important difference between these two structures; namely, the Turing jumps of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees have no least element. In Lerman [14], a systematic investigation of properties of the jumps of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees was suggested, which could lead to a definition of the jump operator over the elementary theory of the partial ordering of the degrees. Although Cooper [5] found a degree-theoretic definition of the jump operator, Lerman's plan is still interesting. We say a degree a is generic if there is a representative A of a such that A is Cohen generic for the arithmetical sentences. By Jockusch [5], the statement that A is Cohen generic for the arithmetical sentences is equivalent to saying that for any arithmetical set S of binary strings, there is a σ extended by A such that σ is in S or no extension of σ is in S . First, we investigate the relation between generic degrees and upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. In the case D (≤ 0′), the set of degrees below 0′, it is well known that any nonrecursive r.e. degree bounds a 1-generic degree (Cohen generic for Σ 1 sentences). Jockusch and Ponser [12] showed that any degree a with a ″ &gt; T ( a ∪ 0′)′ bounds a 1-generic degree.</description><subject>Degree of unsolvability</subject><subject>Induction assumption</subject><subject>Mathematical functions</subject><subject>Mathematical induction</subject><subject>Mathematical logic</subject><subject>Mathematical theorems</subject><subject>Natural numbers</subject><subject>Number theoretic functions</subject><subject>Oracles</subject><issn>0022-4812</issn><issn>1943-5886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFbxLwQUfIruLXt5U6q2QlWEFh-XTXaiiWkTdxPQf29KQh99OjDzcebMQeic4GvKsLyhVCYc8wM0IZqzOFFKHKIJxpTGXBF6jE5CKDHGieZqguLnYltsbBV1TQM-Sutu60KU1z6yvmg_N9AWWb918OEBwik6ym0V4GzUKVo_Pqxmi3j5On-a3S3jjEnWxikhqXOMJ9pyx2nuhM1yRpQGrYngFHIOKhOpyxRVmGBiBRE65ynBoIFxNkW3g2_j6xKyFrqsKpxpfB_V_5raFma2Xo7TUcpQGUIUk5xzvbO42Ft8dxBaU9ad3_apDaG6_55KTnvqaqAyX4fgId_fINjs6jRjnT15OZBlaGv_DxYPWBFa-Nlj1n8ZIZlMjJi_GfGiV_J9cW9m7A-ZkIAb</recordid><startdate>19940601</startdate><enddate>19940601</enddate><creator>Kumabe, Masahiro</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Association for Symbolic Logic, Inc</general><general>Association for Symbolic Logic</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940601</creationdate><title>Minimal upper bounds for arithmetical degrees</title><author>Kumabe, Masahiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b11bdd3459a4d42fd6acf3189e991642ef4e8c6bdc8280101a6169f4b10e9e343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Degree of unsolvability</topic><topic>Induction assumption</topic><topic>Mathematical functions</topic><topic>Mathematical induction</topic><topic>Mathematical logic</topic><topic>Mathematical theorems</topic><topic>Natural numbers</topic><topic>Number theoretic functions</topic><topic>Oracles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumabe, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>The Journal of symbolic logic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumabe, Masahiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimal upper bounds for arithmetical degrees</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of symbolic logic</jtitle><date>1994-06-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>516</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>516-528</pages><issn>0022-4812</issn><eissn>1943-5886</eissn><abstract>This paper was inspired by Lerman [14] in which he proved various properties of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. The degrees which are upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees were first studied by Hodes [5] and Enderton and Putnam [5]. Enderton and Putnam [5] showed that if a is an upper bound for the arithmetical degrees, then a (2) ≥ 0 ( ω ) . This area was further studied by Hodes [5], Knight, Lachlan and Soare [12], Jockusch and Simpson [12], and Sacks [17]. Enderton and Putnam [5] and Sacks [17] have combined to show that 0 ( ω ) is the least degree in { a (2) : a is an upper bound for the arithmetical degrees}. So there seem to be some analogies between the degrees of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees and the degrees below 0 (2) . But Sacks [17] showed an important difference between these two structures; namely, the Turing jumps of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees have no least element. In Lerman [14], a systematic investigation of properties of the jumps of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees was suggested, which could lead to a definition of the jump operator over the elementary theory of the partial ordering of the degrees. Although Cooper [5] found a degree-theoretic definition of the jump operator, Lerman's plan is still interesting. We say a degree a is generic if there is a representative A of a such that A is Cohen generic for the arithmetical sentences. By Jockusch [5], the statement that A is Cohen generic for the arithmetical sentences is equivalent to saying that for any arithmetical set S of binary strings, there is a σ extended by A such that σ is in S or no extension of σ is in S . First, we investigate the relation between generic degrees and upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. In the case D (≤ 0′), the set of degrees below 0′, it is well known that any nonrecursive r.e. degree bounds a 1-generic degree (Cohen generic for Σ 1 sentences). Jockusch and Ponser [12] showed that any degree a with a ″ &gt; T ( a ∪ 0′)′ bounds a 1-generic degree.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/2275404</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4812
ispartof The Journal of symbolic logic, 1994-06, Vol.59 (2), p.516-528
issn 0022-4812
1943-5886
language eng
recordid cdi_projecteuclid_primary_oai_CULeuclid_euclid_jsl_1183744494
source JSTOR Mathematics and Statistics; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR
subjects Degree of unsolvability
Induction assumption
Mathematical functions
Mathematical induction
Mathematical logic
Mathematical theorems
Natural numbers
Number theoretic functions
Oracles
title Minimal upper bounds for arithmetical degrees
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T20%3A37%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proje&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimal%20upper%20bounds%20for%20arithmetical%20degrees&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20symbolic%20logic&rft.au=Kumabe,%20Masahiro&rft.date=1994-06-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=516&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=516-528&rft.issn=0022-4812&rft.eissn=1943-5886&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2275404&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proje%3E2275404%3C/jstor_proje%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290592742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2275404&rfr_iscdi=true