Minimal upper bounds for arithmetical degrees
This paper was inspired by Lerman [14] in which he proved various properties of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. The degrees which are upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees were first studied by Hodes [5] and Enderton and Putnam [5]. Enderton and Putnam [5] showed that if a is an upper...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of symbolic logic 1994-06, Vol.59 (2), p.516-528 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper was inspired by Lerman [14] in which he proved various properties of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. The degrees which are upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees were first studied by Hodes [5] and Enderton and Putnam [5]. Enderton and Putnam [5] showed that if
a
is an upper bound for the arithmetical degrees, then
a
(2)
≥ 0
(
ω
)
. This area was further studied by Hodes [5], Knight, Lachlan and Soare [12], Jockusch and Simpson [12], and Sacks [17].
Enderton and Putnam [5] and Sacks [17] have combined to show that 0
(
ω
)
is the least degree in {
a
(2)
:
a
is an upper bound for the arithmetical degrees}. So there seem to be some analogies between the degrees of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees and the degrees below 0
(2)
. But Sacks [17] showed an important difference between these two structures; namely, the Turing jumps of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees have no least element. In Lerman [14], a systematic investigation of properties of the jumps of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees was suggested, which could lead to a definition of the jump operator over the elementary theory of the partial ordering of the degrees. Although Cooper [5] found a degree-theoretic definition of the jump operator, Lerman's plan is still interesting.
We say a degree
a
is
generic
if there is a representative
A
of
a
such that
A
is Cohen generic for the arithmetical sentences. By Jockusch [5], the statement that
A
is Cohen generic for the arithmetical sentences is equivalent to saying that for any arithmetical set
S
of binary strings, there is a
σ
extended by
A
such that
σ
is in
S
or no extension of
σ
is in
S
. First, we investigate the relation between generic degrees and upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. In the case
D
(≤ 0′), the set of degrees below 0′, it is well known that any nonrecursive r.e. degree bounds a 1-generic degree (Cohen generic for Σ
1
sentences). Jockusch and Ponser [12] showed that any degree
a
with
a
″ >
T
(
a
∪ 0′)′ bounds a 1-generic degree. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4812 1943-5886 |
DOI: | 10.2307/2275404 |