A large power set axiom

Takeuti [6] has suggested the need for higher axioms for set theory which are analogous to higher axioms of infinity, but which claim that power sets are in some sense large. In this paper we investigate a reflection axiom of this sort (Axiom T). In §1, we introduce Axiom T and explore some related...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of symbolic logic 1975-03, Vol.40 (1), p.48-54
1. Verfasser: Cohen, Paul E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Takeuti [6] has suggested the need for higher axioms for set theory which are analogous to higher axioms of infinity, but which claim that power sets are in some sense large. In this paper we investigate a reflection axiom of this sort (Axiom T). In §1, we introduce Axiom T and explore some related axioms. A technical lemma involving an elementary embedding is developed in §2 which allows us, in §3, to prove the relative consistency of Axiom T. The reader is assumed to be familiar with ramified forcing languages and the usual techniques of forcing. A suitable treatment of these subjects is given by Takeuti and Zaring [7]. ZFC, GBC, ZF and GB are the set theories of Zermelo-Fraenkel and of Gödel-Bernays, with and without the axiom of choice (AC). CH is the continuum hypothesis. For α an ordinal, define For p 1 , p 2 ∈ p α let p 1 ≤ p 2 mean that p 1 ⊇ p 2 (thus p 1 is the stronger forcing condition). It is well known that P α satisfies the countable chain condition [5].
ISSN:0022-4812
1943-5886
DOI:10.2307/2272269