A large power set axiom
Takeuti [6] has suggested the need for higher axioms for set theory which are analogous to higher axioms of infinity, but which claim that power sets are in some sense large. In this paper we investigate a reflection axiom of this sort (Axiom T). In §1, we introduce Axiom T and explore some related...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of symbolic logic 1975-03, Vol.40 (1), p.48-54 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Takeuti [6] has suggested the need for higher axioms for set theory which are analogous to higher axioms of infinity, but which claim that power sets are in some sense large. In this paper we investigate a reflection axiom of this sort (Axiom T).
In §1, we introduce Axiom T and explore some related axioms. A technical lemma involving an elementary embedding is developed in §2 which allows us, in §3, to prove the relative consistency of Axiom T.
The reader is assumed to be familiar with ramified forcing languages and the usual techniques of forcing. A suitable treatment of these subjects is given by Takeuti and Zaring [7].
ZFC, GBC, ZF and GB are the set theories of Zermelo-Fraenkel and of Gödel-Bernays, with and without the axiom of choice (AC). CH is the continuum hypothesis.
For α an ordinal, define
For
p
1
,
p
2
∈
p
α
let
p
1
≤
p
2
mean that
p
1
⊇
p
2
(thus
p
1
is the stronger forcing condition). It is well known that
P
α
satisfies the countable chain condition [5]. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4812 1943-5886 |
DOI: | 10.2307/2272269 |