Cardinal-preserving extensions
A classic result of Baumgartner-Harrington-Kleinberg [1] implies that assuming CH a stationary subset of ω1has a CUB subset in a cardinal-perserving generic extension of V, via a forcing of cardinality ω1. Therefore, assuming that$\omega_2^L$is countable: {$X \in L \mid X \subseteq \omega_1^L$and X...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of symbolic logic 2003-12, Vol.68 (4), p.1163-1170 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A classic result of Baumgartner-Harrington-Kleinberg [1] implies that assuming CH a stationary subset of ω1has a CUB subset in a cardinal-perserving generic extension of V, via a forcing of cardinality ω1. Therefore, assuming that$\omega_2^L$is countable: {$X \in L \mid X \subseteq \omega_1^L$and X has a CUB subset in a cardinal -preserving extension of L} is constructible, as it equals the set of constructible subsets of$\omega_1^L$which in L are stationary. Is there a similar such result for subsets of$\ omega_2^L$? Building on work of M. Stanley [9], we show that there is not. We shall also consider a number of related problems, examining the extent to which they are "solvable" in the above sense, as well as defining a notion of reduction between them. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4812 1943-5886 |
DOI: | 10.2178/jsl/1067620178 |